Related Experiment Videos
Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke
Carlos J. Rodriguez1, Shunichi Homma
1Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. sh23@columbia.edu
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
|June 5, 2003
Summary
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is linked to ischemic stroke risk. While medical therapies show equal benefit for preventing recurrent events, the effectiveness of PFO closure requires further randomized trials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common cardiac anomaly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke.
- The presumed mechanism involves paradoxical embolism, where venous clots travel through the PFO to the systemic circulation.
- Current primary stroke prevention data for PFO patients is lacking, and no therapy is recommended for asymptomatic individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current understanding of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and its association with ischemic stroke.
- To evaluate the existing treatment options for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with PFO.
- To identify knowledge gaps and the need for further research, particularly randomized trials comparing PFO closure with medical management.
Main Methods:
- Review of observational data from prospective and retrospective trials.
- Analysis of findings from the Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study.
- Discussion of current treatment modalities including surgical closure, percutaneous device closure, anticoagulants, and antiplatelet agents.
Main Results:
- Observational studies suggest a link between PFO and ischemic stroke risk, likely due to paradoxical embolism.
- The Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study found antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies to be equally effective in preventing recurrent adverse events.
- No definitive randomized trials have compared PFO closure (surgical or percutaneous) with medical therapy.
Conclusions:
- While PFO is associated with stroke risk, primary prevention strategies are undefined.
- Medical therapies (anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents) offer comparable benefits for secondary prevention in PFO patients.
- The superiority of PFO closure over medical management for recurrent stroke prevention remains unproven and requires further investigation through randomized controlled trials.