Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A pilot study comparing two methods of intermittent catheterization: limitations and challenges.

Rene A Day1, Katherine N Moore, Marilyn K Albers

  • 1Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Urologic Nursing
|June 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary

A pilot study compared closed versus open intermittent catheterization systems. The closed system showed fewer positive urine cultures, suggesting improved infection control.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Canadian Health Research Funding Patterns for Sexual and Gender Minority Populations Reflect Exclusion of Women.

LGBT health·2024
Same author

Ovarian cancer think tank: An overview of the current status of ovarian cancer screening and recommendations for future directions.

Gynecologic oncology reports·2024
Same author

Are we moving the dial? Canadian health research funding trends for women's health, 2S/LGBTQ + health, sex, or gender considerations.

Biology of sex differences·2023
Same author

An effective evidence-based cleaning method for the safe reuse of intermittent urinary catheters: In vitro testing.

Neurourology and urodynamics·2020
Same author

Tissue response to applied loading using different designs of penile compression clamps.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2019
Same author

Reuse of intermittent catheters: a qualitative study of IC users' perspectives.

BMJ open·2018

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Infectious Disease Prevention

Background:

  • Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common complications of intermittent catheterization.
  • Traditional open catheterization systems may increase infection risk.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of a closed catheter system versus an open system in reducing positive urine cultures.
  • To identify design limitations for a larger, multi-center study.

Main Methods:

  • Pilot study involving 11 subjects.
  • Collection and analysis of 33 urine samples.
  • Comparison of bacterial growth between closed and open intermittent catheterization systems.

Main Results:

  • The closed catheter system demonstrated a lower incidence of positive urine cultures compared to the open system.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Preliminary data collection identified unforeseen challenges in study design.
  • Conclusions:

    • Closed intermittent catheterization systems may offer an advantage in preventing bacteriuria.
    • Pilot study findings are crucial for refining the methodology of the main, multi-center trial.