Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Accepting critically ill transfer patients: adverse effect on a referral center's outcome and benchmark measures
Andrew L Rosenberg1, Timothy P Hofer, Cathy Strachan
1University of Michigan and the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0048, USA. arosen@umich.edu
Background:
Common methods of benchmarking clinical performance rarely, if ever, account for admission source and, in particular, the effect of a patient being transferred from one medical center to another. Small biases in comparisons of observed versus expected deaths can substantially affect how high-quality institutions compare with peer hospitals. With the most sophisticated and validated set of case-mix measures available for patients, the intensive care unit is an ideal setting in which to study the effect of a patient's being transferred from another hospital.
Objective:
To determine the extent of bias in benchmarking outcomes when performance measures do not account for transfer patients' greater severity of illness.
Design:
Prospectively developed cohort study.
Setting:
Medical intensive care unit (MICU) at a tertiary care university hospital.
Patients:
4579 consecutive admissions for 4208 patients from 1 January 1994 to 1 April 1998.
Measurements:
MICU and hospital lengths of stay, MICU readmission, and hospital mortality rates.
Results:
Compared with directly admitted patients, MICU patients transferred from another hospital had significantly higher Acute Physiology Scores at the time of admission and discharge (P = 0.001). Even after full adjustment for case mix and severity of illness, transfer patients had a 38% longer MICU stay (95% CI, 32% to 45%), a 41% longer hospital stay (CI, 34% to 50%), and a 2.2 times greater odds of hospital mortality (CI, 1.7 to 2.8) than directly admitted patients. With identical efficiency and quality, a referral hospital with a 25% MICU transfer rate compared with another with a 0% transfer rate would be penalized by 14 excess deaths per 1000 admissions when a benchmarking program adjusts only for case mix and severity of illness and not for the source of admission.
Conclusions:
In a setting with the most thorough diagnostic-based, case-mix adjustment and the most physiologically precise severity-of-illness information, accepting transfer patients can adversely affect efficiency and quality benchmarks. Benchmarking and profiling efforts beyond intensive care units must also recognize and account for this phenomenon; otherwise, referral centers may have an incentive to refuse care for patients who could benefit from being transferred to their facility.
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
