Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The surgical error examination is a novel method for objective technical knowledge assessment.

Simon Bann1, Vivek Datta, Mansoor Khan

  • 1Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology and Medicine, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, St. Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Rd., W2 1NY, London, United Kingdom. s.bann@ic.ac.uk

American Journal of Surgery
|June 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying quality markers and improvement measures for ward-based surgical care: a semistructured interview study.

American journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Using preoperative imaging for intraoperative guidance: a case of mistaken identity.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2015
Same author

The quality narrative in health care.

Lancet (London, England)·2015
Same author

The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Frontline gastroenterology·2015
Same author

A wearable mobility assessment device for total knee replacement: A longitudinal feasibility study.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2015
Same author

A national incident reporting and learning system in England and Wales, but at what cost?

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2015

Simple error analysis in synthetic models effectively assesses surgical skill. This novel method demonstrates construct validity by distinguishing surgeons of different experience levels.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Simulation
  • Assessment Methodology

Background:

  • Objective surgical skill assessment is crucial for medical training.
  • A new method utilizing simple error analysis in synthetic models is explored.
  • The study investigates the construct validity of this novel assessment approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the construct validity of a novel surgical skill assessment method.
  • To determine if simple error analysis in synthetic models can differentiate surgeon proficiency.
  • To establish a reliable tool for evaluating surgical expertise.

Main Methods:

  • Two examination protocols were developed using synthetic surgical models.
  • Models included either intentional errors or represented good surgical practice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Protocols ranged from basic (skin closure) to complex procedures, assessed by junior surgeons.

    • Main Results:

    • Eighty-nine surgeons participated in the assessment.
    • Both protocols successfully discriminated between skill levels at statistically significant levels (p < 0.05).
    • The error analysis method proved effective in differentiating surgeon experience.

    Conclusions:

    • The study establishes construct validity for the error analysis method.
    • Simple error analysis in synthetic models is a valid tool for assessing surgical skill.
    • This method can reliably distinguish between surgeons with varying levels of experience.