Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychophysical threshold variability in cochlear implant subjects.

William D Ferguson1, Leslie M Collins, David W Smith

  • 1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Box 90291, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0291, USA.

Hearing Research
|June 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Variability in auditory neural responses, a stochastic component, impacts speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Higher variability correlates with better speech understanding, offering insights into device performance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Strain Evolution and Mutations in Western Australia in the Context of Nirsevimab Prophylaxis.

Open forum infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Determinants of respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus transmission.

Clinical microbiology reviews·2025
Same author

Genetic diversity of Murray Valley encephalitis virus 1951-2020 identified via phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2025
Same author

Global epidemiology, seasonality and climatic drivers of the four human parainfluenza virus types.

The Journal of infection·2025
Same author

Presentation of Asymptomatic Ebstein's Anomaly: A Case Report.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Independent repeated mutations within the alphaviruses Ross River virus and Barmah Forest virus indicates convergent evolution and past positive selection in ancestral populations despite ongoing purifying selection.

Virus evolution·2024

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Cochlear Implant Technology
  • Speech Perception

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) aim to restore hearing but often result in suboptimal speech recognition.
  • Differences in neural responses to electrical vs. acoustic stimulation are implicated in CI performance limitations.
  • The absence of neural response stochasticity during electrical stimulation is a hypothesized cause for reduced speech clarity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate psychophysical threshold variability as a measure of neural response stochasticity in subjects with cochlear implants.
  • To explore the relationship between stimulus parameters (phase duration, stimulation mode) and threshold variability.
  • To determine if neural stochasticity correlates with speech recognition performance in CI users.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Collected psychophysical threshold data from human and non-human subjects with intracochlear electrode arrays.
  • Utilized monopolar and bipolar stimulation modes across various phase durations.
  • Analyzed threshold variability as an indicator of the stochastic nature of neural responses.

Main Results:

  • Threshold variability increased with increased phase duration, consistent with predictions based on neural input/output curves.
  • Experimental results in both cat and human subjects confirmed the predicted relationship between phase duration and threshold variability.
  • Higher threshold variability, indicating greater neural stochasticity, was associated with improved speech recognition scores.

Conclusions:

  • Psychophysical threshold variability is a measurable indicator of neural stochasticity in cochlear implant users.
  • Stimulus parameters like phase duration significantly influence the degree of neural stochasticity.
  • Enhanced neural stochasticity may be a key factor contributing to better speech recognition outcomes in individuals with cochlear implants.