Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Exfoliation of Egyptian Blue and Han Blue, Two Alkali Earth Copper Silicate-based Pigments
Published on: April 24, 2014
Spectroscopy and bonding in side-on and end-on Cu2(S2) cores: comparison to peroxide analogues
Peng Chen1, Kiyoshi Fujisawa, Matthew E Helton
1Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Abstract:
Spectroscopic methods combined with density functional calculations were used to study the disulfide-Cu(II) bonding interactions in the side-on micro -eta(2):eta(2)-bridged Cu(2)(S(2)) complex, [[Cu(II)[HB(3,5-Pr(i)(2)pz)(3)]](2)(S(2))], and the end-on trans- micro -1,2-bridged Cu(2)(S(2)) complex, [[Cu(II)(TMPA)](2)(S(2))](2+), in correlation to their peroxide structural analogues. Resonance Raman shows weaker S-S bonds and stronger Cu-S bonds in the disulfide complexes relative to the O-O and Cu-O bonds in the peroxide analogues. The weaker S-S bonds come from the more limited interaction between the S 3p orbitals relative to that of the O 2s/p hybrid orbitals. The stronger Cu-S bonds result from the more covalent Cu-disulfide interactions relative to the Cu-peroxide interactions. This is consistent with the higher energy of the disulfide valence level relative to that of the peroxide. The ground states of the side-on Cu(2)(S(2))/Cu(2)(O(2)) complexes are more covalent than those of the end-on Cu(2)(S(2))/Cu(2)(O(2)) complexes. This derives from the larger sigma-donor interactions in the side-on micro -eta(2):eta(2) structure, which has four Cu-disulfide/peroxide bonds, relative to the end-on trans- micro -1,2 structure, which forms two bonds to the Cu. The larger disulfide/peroxide sigma-donor interactions in the side-on complexes are reflected in their more intense higher energy disulfide/peroxide to Cu charge transfer transitions in the absorption spectra. The large ground-state covalencies of the side-on complexes result in significant nuclear distortions in the ligand-to-metal charge transfer excited states, which give rise to the strong resonance Raman enhancements of the metal-ligand and intraligand vibrations. Particularly, the large covalency of the Cu-disulfide interaction in the side-on Cu(2)(S(2)) complex leads to a different rR enhancement profile, relative to the peroxide analogues, reflecting a S-S bond distortion in the opposite directions in the disulfide/peroxide pi(sigma) to Cu charge transfer excited states. A ligand sigma back-bonding interaction exists only in the side-on complexes, and there is more sigma mixing in the side-on Cu(2)(S(2)) complex than in the side-on Cu(2)(O(2)) complex. This sigma back-bonding is shown to significantly weaken the S-S/O-O bond relative to that of the analogous end-on complex, leading to the low nu(S)(-)(S)/nu(O)(-)(O) vibrational frequencies observed in the resonance Raman spectra of the side-on complexes.
More Related Videos
04:09Demonstrating the Simplicity and In Situ Temperature Monitoring of the Mechanochemical Synthesis of Metal Chalcogenides Suitable for Thermoelectrics
Published on: August 30, 2024
09:22Synthesis and Performance Evaluations of ZnCoS/ZnCdS with Twin Crystal Structure for Multifunctional Redox Photocatalysis in Energy Applications
Published on: July 25, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Ultraviolet and Visible (UV–Vis) Spectroscopy: Overview
UV–Vis Spectroscopy of Conjugated Systems
One of the factors influencing λmax is the extent of conjugation in the...
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Woodward–Fieser Rules