Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An exposure prevention rating method for intervention needs assessment and effectiveness evaluation.

Anthony D LaMontagne1, Richard A Youngstrom, Marvin Lewiton

  • 1Monash University Medical School, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
|June 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rationale for Accreditation Criteria for the MATES in Construction Workplace Suicide Prevention Program.

New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS·2026
Same author

Suicide and the Workplace - A Call for Action.

Crisis·2026
Same author

University student mental health before and after implementation of a mental health strategy: a repeated cross-sectional study from Australia.

Health promotion international·2025
Same author

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of work-focused interventions for employees with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress.

International archives of occupational and environmental health·2025
Same author

The Influence of Relationships on Engagement in an Australian Construction Industry Suicide Prevention Programme.

American journal of industrial medicine·2025
Same author

To what extent can attributable fractions in occupational epidemiology be estimated in the absence of key data?

American journal of epidemiology·2025

A new checklist method systematically prioritizes hazardous substance exposure interventions in manufacturing. This tool reliably assesses workplace safety, identifying areas needing urgent attention for improved worker protection.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Industrial Hygiene
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Hazardous substance exposures in manufacturing pose significant risks to worker health.
  • Existing methods for intervention prioritization and effectiveness evaluation can be resource-intensive.
  • A need exists for a systematic, reliable, and cost-effective assessment tool.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a new method for prioritizing interventions for hazardous substance exposures.
  • To assess the effectiveness of interventions using a standardized rating system.
  • To provide an upstream prevention focus complementing quantitative exposure assessments.

Main Methods:

  • A checklist with a 2x3 matrix (exposure potential vs. protection; materials, processes, human interface) was developed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Indicator variables were rated high/moderate/low and combined into an overall Exposure Prevention rating.
  • The checklist was applied by industrial hygienists during walk-through inspections (N=131 areas) and inter-rater reliability was assessed.

    • Main Results:

    • The majority of assessed areas (64%) showed well-controlled exposures (ratings 1-2).
    • 26% of areas indicated room for improvement (ratings 3-4), while 10% urgently needed intervention (ratings 5-6).
    • Excellent inter-rater reliability (weighted kappa = 0.84) was achieved for the overall ratings.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed rating scheme demonstrates good discriminatory power and reliability.
    • It shows promise as a broadly applicable, inexpensive tool for intervention needs assessment and effectiveness evaluation.
    • Further validation studies are recommended as a next step.