Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects.

G Harvey1, M Wensing

  • 1Royal College of Nursing Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|June 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paediatric Eczema Hospital Admissions, and Topical Corticosteroid Dispensing Pre- and Post-Admission, in New Zealand From 2007 to 2019.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2025
Same author

Feasibility of implementing a decision aid for advanced cancer patients in a comprehensive cancer centers' outpatient setting: Valuable lessons learned.

Cancer medicine·2024
Same author

Quantification of cavitating flows with neutron imaging.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

[Chronic low back pain-user types of ambulatory care : Cluster analysis of the utilization of ambulatory health care resources with administrative data of the AOK Baden-Württemberg].

Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)·2021
Same author

Converting habits of antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections in German primary care (CHANGE-3) - process evaluation of a complex intervention.

BMC family practice·2020
Same author

Study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and treatment as usual in bipolar disorder.

BMC psychiatry·2019
Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
See all related articles

Evaluating small-scale quality improvement projects locally offers valuable insights. This process helps optimize interventions, manage resources effectively, and enhance healthcare quality improvement knowledge.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Evaluation is crucial for quality improvement (QI).
  • Local-level evaluations of small-scale QI initiatives yield significant learning opportunities.
  • Understanding complex change processes is vital for effective healthcare QI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the benefits of evaluating local, small-scale QI initiatives.
  • To demonstrate how local evaluations contribute to broader QI knowledge.
  • To emphasize the role of evaluation in optimizing QI interventions and resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing focused audits and developmental studies for within-project evaluation.
  • Employing multiple case studies and process evaluations for generalized lessons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conducting formal evaluations of local projects to inform the QI knowledge base.

    • Main Results:

    • Local evaluations monitor project impact and identify emerging issues.
    • Comparative analysis of local projects facilitates lesson-drawing.
    • Detailed data collection supports larger evaluation efforts.

    Conclusions:

    • Evaluating small-scale QI projects optimizes intervention choices and resource use.
    • Formal evaluation of local initiatives builds theory on implementation processes.
    • This approach enhances understanding of complex change processes in healthcare QI.