Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forensic aspects of guidelines.

L Figgener1

  • 1Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Muenster, Germany. figgenl@uni-muenster.de

The Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology
|June 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Medical and dental professionals must understand how guidelines and directives impact legal cases. Proper formulation of these recommendations can prevent litigation and improve patient care standards.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dental X-rays and risk of meningioma: anatomy of a case-control study.

Journal of dental research·2013
Same author

[Medical expert opinions in oral and maxillofacial medicine regarding incisor tooth trauma].

Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG·2005
Same author

Digital radiography and electronic data storage from the perspective of legal requirements for record keeping.

The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology·2003
Same author

[Forensic evaluation of injuries to nerves and jaw bone after wisdom tooth extraction from the viewpoint of current jurisprudence].

Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG·2001
Same author

Non-acceptance of prosthetic appliances at the focus of forensic consequences.

The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology·1996
Same author

The duty of the dentist to keep records--significance and relevance according to German law.

The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology·1994

Area of Science:

  • Medical-Legal Studies
  • Dental Jurisprudence
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • Medical and dental litigation frequently hinges on whether treatment adhered to best practices.
  • Professionals increasingly use recommendations, guidelines, and directives to meet required standards.
  • Varying legal bindingness exists between guidelines (non-binding) and directives (binding).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the judicial implications of medical and dental guidelines and recommendations.
  • To advise on formulating guidelines to avoid legal pitfalls and defensive practice.
  • To explore the potential positive influence of well-structured guidelines on expert evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Legal analysis of medical and dental litigation concerning best practice standards.
  • Review of the varying legal enforceability of recommendations, guidelines, and directives.
  • Discussion of the impact of guideline formulation on legal outcomes and professional practice.

Main Results:

  • Deviation from any form of guideline, recommendation, or directive complicates litigation outcomes.
  • Rigid regulations within guidelines can lead to over-defensive medical/dental practices.
  • Guidelines, when comprehensible and reflecting current practice, can be valuable tools.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of judicial implications is crucial when creating medical and dental guidelines.
  • Guidelines should serve as practical information, not rigid mandates, to be most effective.
  • Well-formulated guidelines can positively influence expert testimony in legal proceedings.

Related Experiment Videos