Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical case processing by medical experts and subexperts.

Remy Rikers1, Wilco Te Winkel, Sofie Loyens

  • 1Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Rikers@fsw.eur.nl

The Journal of Psychology
|June 11, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Going beyond competencies: Building blocks for a patient- and population-centered medical curriculum.

Medical teacher·2024
Same author

Influence of tutor interventions and group process on medical students' engagement in problem-based learning.

Medical education·2024
Same author

Measurement of student engagement in health professions education: a review of literature.

BMC medical education·2023
Same author

Improving Handoff by Deliberate Cognitive Processing: Results from a Randomized Controlled Experimental Study.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2021
Same author

It's the destination: diagnostic accuracy and reasoning.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2019
Same author

Comparing Cognitive Control Performance During Seated Rest and Self-Paced Cycling on a Desk Bike in Preadolescent Children.

Journal of physical activity & health·2019

Medical specialists diagnose cases using automatic, schema-based knowledge rather than explicit rules. Experts and subexperts differed in processing speed and accuracy, not component focus, when diagnosing cardiology cases.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Cognitive Science
  • Clinical Reasoning

Background:

  • Medical specialists utilize schema-based knowledge for automatic diagnosis, unlike explicit reasoning.
  • The diagnostic reasoning differences between medical specialists and subexperts remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in diagnostic reasoning between medical experts (cardiologists) and subexperts (pulmonologists) using clinical case evaluations.
  • To determine if expertise level influences the focus on specific clinical case components.

Main Methods:

  • Cardiologists, pulmonologists, and medical students evaluated segmented cardiology cases presented sequentially.
  • Participants studied, diagnosed, and recalled case components including patient history, physical examination, and lab data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Experts and subexperts did not differ significantly in their emphasis on specific case components.
  • The primary distinction was the speed and accuracy of processing information among experts, subexperts, and students.

Conclusions:

  • Expertise in medical diagnosis is associated with faster and more accurate information processing, rather than differential component focus.
  • Schema-based knowledge in specialists facilitates efficient diagnostic reasoning.