Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What's not wrong with conditional organ donation?

T M Wilkinson1

  • 1Departments of Community Health and Philosophy, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. m.wilkinson@auckland.ac.nz

Journal of Medical Ethics
|June 11, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factitious disorder and liability.

Monash bioethics review·2026
Same author

Contagious Disease and Self-Defence.

Res publica (Liverpool, England)·2020
Same author

Managing complex respiratory patients in the community: an evaluation of a pilot integrated respiratory care service.

BMJ open respiratory research·2017
Same author

Should Children Be Given Priority in Kidney Allocation?

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2016
Same author

A Two-Pathway Mathematical Model of the LH Response to GnRH that Predicts Self-Priming.

International journal of endocrinology·2013
Same author

Thinking harder about nudges.

Journal of medical ethics·2013
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

This paper critiques a panel

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Organ Transplantation
  • Public Policy

Background:

  • A British case involved conditional organ donation based on race.
  • A government-appointed panel condemned all conditional organ offers, advocating for altruism and greatest need.
  • This paper examines the ethical and logical basis of the panel's condemnation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the reasoning of the panel that condemned conditional organ donation offers.
  • To evaluate the ethical permissibility of accepting conditional organ offers in transplantation.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of the panel's arguments.
  • Distinction between the offer and acceptance of conditional organ donations.
  • Review of principles of altruism and resource allocation in organ transplantation.
Keywords:
Health Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The panel's reasoning fails to demonstrate that all conditional organ donation offers are inherently wrong.
  • The panel overlooked the critical distinction between the act of making a conditional offer and the act of accepting it.
  • Even under a charitable interpretation, the panel's argument does not preclude selective acceptance of conditional offers.

Conclusions:

  • The panel's condemnation of all conditional organ donation offers lacks sufficient ethical and logical merit.
  • A more nuanced approach is required, distinguishing between the offer and acceptance of conditional donations.
  • The ethical framework for organ transplantation should allow for selective acceptance of conditional offers in certain circumstances.