Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
Published on: February 15, 2015
Effects of the oral form of ondansetron on cerebellar dysfunction. A multi-center double-blind study
J C Bier1, S Dethy, J Hildebrand
1Hopital Erasme, Service de Neurologie 3 degrees étage, 808 route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and the safety of ondansetron administered orally in patients with a cerebellar disorder. The study was a randomised, multi-center, double-blind trial. The patients were randomised either to oral ondansetron 8 mg or to placebo twice daily for seven days. Cerebellar dysfunction was quantified before and after treatment using the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). We performed a global analysis (total scores), we analysed by subscores (4 subscores: oculomotor, speech, kinetic, postural) and subgroups (4 subgroups: Cerebellar Cortical Atrophy (CCA), Multiple Systemic Atrophy (MSA), Familial Cerebellar Degeneration (FCD) and miscellaneous cerebellar disorders), and we also performed an analysis by individual test items. We investigated whether ondansetron and placebo had different effects upon ICARS total scores and subscores in the 4 subgroups considered together or separately. For p values < 0.05, we subsequently applied the Mann-Whitney test to compare ondansetron and placebo effect for each individual item. We evaluated 45 of the 46 patients included. No effect was found in global analysis. We found no difference in the analysis of the ICARS subscores. Concerning the individual test items, there was a significant difference between the placebo and ondansetron for the finger-to-nose test (p = 0.049), the Heel-to-Knee test (HK); (p = 0.03), the Body Sway Eyes Closed (p = 0.017) and the Body Sway Eyes Open (BSEO); (p = 0.014). There was no significant difference for tremor in upper limbs (p = 0.32) or for gait (p = 0.49). The Mann-Whitney test showed a greater effect of ondansetron than placebo for BSEO in miscellaneous disorders (p = 0.013) and for HK in FCD (p = 0.036), but ondansetron was deleterious for HK in CCA (p = 0.019). Our study showed no effect of oral ondansetron on global cerebellar dysfunction. The analysis by subgroups showed that the oral form of ondansetron (a) is deleterious for coordination in patients with CCA, (b) has no effect upon tremor in upper limbs, and (c) has a mild effect upon posture and coordination in lower limbs in some subgroups of ataxic diseases.
More Related Videos
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
08:53Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic drugs,...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age