Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
The heart failure revascularisation trial (HEART): rationale, design and methodology
J G F Cleland1, N Freemantle, S G Ball
1Department of Academic Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, Kingston upon Hull HU16 5JQ, UK. g.m.porter@hull.ac.uk
Insights
This study investigates if revascularisation improves survival in heart failure patients with coronary artery disease and viable myocardium. The HEART trial aims to determine if assessing myocardial ischaemia and viability for revascularisation should be routine care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Most heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to coronary artery disease (CAD) exhibit myocardium in jeopardy.
- The safety and benefit of revascularisation in these patients remain unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if revascularisation improves survival in patients with LVSD, heart failure, CAD, and jeopardized myocardium.
- To assess the impact of revascularisation on mortality, symptoms, quality of life, and health economics.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial comparing revascularisation plus optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy alone.
- Patients with heart failure, LVSD (ejection fraction <35%), and evidence of coronary disease were included.
- Myocardial viability and ischaemia were assessed using various imaging techniques; primary outcome was all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- Currently, 111 patients have consented, and 70 have been randomized.
- The main reason for patient dropout between consent and randomization was the lack of evidence for myocardial ischaemia or hibernation.
- Viability testing results are pending for 22 patients.
Conclusions:
- The HEART trial is designed to provide crucial data on the role of revascularisation in heart failure patients with LVSD and CAD.
- Findings will inform whether routine assessment of myocardial ischaemia and viability for revascularisation is warranted in such patients.
Background:
Most patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) secondary to coronary artery disease (CAD) have evidence of myocardium in jeopardy (reversible ischaemia and/or stunning hibernation). It is not known whether revascularisation in such cases is safe or beneficial.
Aims:
To determine whether revascularisation will improve the survival of patients with LVSD and heart failure secondary to CAD and myocardium in jeopardy.
Methods:
This is a randomised controlled trial comparing revascularisation or not, in addition to optimal medical therapy with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and an anti-thrombotic agent. Patients must have heart failure requiring treatment with diuretics, a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and evidence of coronary disease. Myocardial viability and ischaemia are assessed by a broad range of techniques including stress echocardiography and nuclear imaging. All imaging tests are reviewed in core laboratories to ensure uniform reporting. Any conventional revascularisation technique is permitted. The primary outcome measure is all cause mortality. Symptoms, quality of life and health economic issues will also be explored. Assuming an annual mortality of 10% in the control group and allowing for substantial cross-over rates, a study of 800 patients followed for 5 years has 80% power with an alpha of 0.05 (two-sided) to show a 25% reduction in mortality with revascularisation.
Results:
At the time of writing 180 patients have been screened for inclusion, 111 have consented to participate and 70 have been randomised. The results of viability testing are awaited in 22 patients. Twenty-six patients had been investigated for myocardial viability and/or by angiography prior to consent, as part of the routine practice in that cardiology department. Of 68 patients who have completed assessment only after consent, 47 (69%) were included. The principal reason for drop-out between consent and randomisation was lack of evidence of myocardial ischaemia or hibernation.
Conclusion:
The HEART trial will help to determine whether investigation of myocardial ischaemia and/or viability with a view to revascularisation should become part of the routine care of patients with heart failure due to LVSD and CAD.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
