Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?

H M Herbert1, K Jordan, D W Flanagan

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Hinchingbrooke Park, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK. helen.herbert@ntlworld.com

Eye (London, England)
|June 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personalised antiemetic prophylaxis with NEPA for patients at high risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results from the randomised, multinational MyRisk trial.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

From toxicity assessment to adaptive safety care: implementing comprehensive fast-track safety evaluation for anticancer drug development.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

A taxonomy of the factors contributing to the overtreatment of cancer patients at the end of life. What is the problem? Why does it happen? How can it be addressed?

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Beyond the usual window: persistent nausea with trastuzumab deruxtecan calls for new management strategies.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
Same author

2023 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

ESMO open·2024
Same author

MASCC/ESMO antiemetic guidelines: Introduction to the 2023 guidelines update.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2023
Same journal

Tubing the trabeculectomy: a novel filtration technique.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Retinal non-perfusion progression in severe non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy over time: INSPIRED study report 2.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Macular serpiginous choroiditis versus macular serpiginous-like choroiditis: clinical features, outcomes and prognosis.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Association of baseline brain care score with the incidence of age-related eye diseases.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

A comparative analysis of carbon dioxide versus nitrous oxide as the pressurised gas driving a retinal cryotherapy unit.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Determinants of regression kinetics in observed stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity without plus disease.

Eye (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

Digital imaging for diabetic retinopathy shows high specificity but low sensitivity, failing to detect some cases. Further imaging or expert review may improve detection rates.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diabetology

Background:

  • Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of vision loss in diabetic patients.
  • Early detection and treatment are crucial to prevent severe vision impairment.
  • Digital fundus imaging offers a potential screening tool, but its efficacy requires validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital fundus imaging versus slit-lamp biomicroscopy for diabetic retinopathy detection.
  • To evaluate if the digital imaging screening meets British Diabetic Association (BDA) criteria for sensitivity, specificity, and technical failure rate.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 145 diabetic patients referred for screening.
  • Acquisition of a single 45-degree nonmydriatic digital fundus image per eye.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ophthalmologist grading of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study standards, compared with slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

    • Main Results:

    • 26% of eyes exhibited diabetic retinopathy; 3% had sight-threatening retinopathy.
    • Digital imaging achieved 38% sensitivity and 95% specificity, with a 4% technical failure rate.
    • Low sensitivity was attributed to missing minimal maculopathy and peripheral retinopathy; good inter-consultant agreement was observed.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital imaging meets BDA guidelines for specificity and technical failure rate but not sensitivity.
    • The current single-image protocol misses significant retinopathy, particularly peripheral and macular forms.
    • Recommendations include adding a nasal image and using slit-lamp biomicroscopy for poor-quality macular images to enhance detection.