Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Good foragers can also be good at detecting predators.

W Cresswell1, J L Quinn, M J Whittingham

  • 1Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. will.cresswell@zoo.ox.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|June 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognostic markers in oesophageal and gastric cancer review. Are they ready for clinical practice?

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

Spatio-Temporal Variation in Diet Among Age and Sex Cohorts of a Model Generalist Bird Species, the Great Tit <i>Parus major</i>: New Insights Revealed by DNA Metabarcoding.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

sendigR: an R package to leverage the value of CDISC SEND datasets for cross-study analysis.

Frontiers in toxicology·2024
Same author

Carbetocin vs. oxytocin at elective caesarean delivery: challenges and complexities in performing and interpreting a non-inferiority trial.

Anaesthesia·2023
Same author

Underwater visibility constrains the foraging behaviour of a diving pelagic seabird.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2022
Same author

Experiences of employers, work colleagues, and mentors with new veterinary graduates and preferences towards new graduate support programmes.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2020

Good foragers are better predators and detectors. Higher feeding rates in chaffinches correlate with faster predator detection, challenging the idea that foraging and vigilance are mutually exclusive. This impacts understanding animal risk management.

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary biology

Background:

  • The trade-off between predation risk and starvation risk is a key factor in animal survival strategies.
  • Understanding the relationship between foraging and vigilance is crucial for managing these risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if higher foraging rates in chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs) come at the expense of predator detection speed.
  • To determine if consistent high-performing foragers are slower to respond to threats.

Main Methods:

  • Wild-caught chaffinches were observed in a captive setting.
  • The study analyzed the relationship between feeding (peck) rates and vigilance (scanning/head-up) rates.
  • Response times to a simulated predator (model sparrowhawk) were measured.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Increased scanning (head-up) rate correlated with quicker predator response times.
  • Contrary to predictions, higher peck rates led to increased head-up rates and shorter head-up/head-down periods.
  • Individual chaffinches exhibited consistent foraging and vigilance behaviors, indicating good foragers were also good at detecting predators.

Conclusions:

  • Feeding rate influences vigilance patterns in species with similar foraging strategies.
  • The most effective foragers may also be the most adept at detecting predators, challenging the mutual exclusivity of foraging and vigilance.
  • These findings offer mechanistic explanations for vigilance declines in larger groups and have implications for predator-prey dynamics.