Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality
Michele G Alexander1, Terri D Fisher
1Department of Psychology, 366 Little Hall, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5742, USA. michelea@maine.edu
Abstract:
Men report more permissive sexual attitudes and behavior than do women. This experiment tested whether these differences might result from false accommodation to gender norms (distorted reporting consistent with gender stereotypes). Participants completed questionnaires under three conditions. Sex differences in self-reported sexual behavior were negligible in a bogus pipeline condition in which participants believed lying could be detected, moderate in an anonymous condition, and greatest in an exposure threat condition in which the experimenter could potentially view participants responses. This pattern was clearest for behaviors considered less acceptable for women than men (e.g., masturbation, exposure to hardcore & softcore erotica). Results suggest that some sex differences in self-reported sexual behavior reflect responses influenced by normative expectations for men and women.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Correspondence Bias

