Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Composition in Advanced Atherosclerotic Lesions of Smooth Muscle Cell Lineage-Tracing Mice
Published on: February 20, 2019
The comparative medical costs of atherothrombotic disease in European countries
Emile Levy1, Sylvie Gabriel, Jérôme Dinet
1Université Paris IX, Dauphine, Paris, France.
Insights
Healthcare costs for atherothrombotic diseases like myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke (IS) vary significantly across Europe. Management costs differ due to local treatment patterns and rehabilitation availability.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- Atherothrombotic disease, encompassing myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke (IS), imposes a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems.
- Limited comparative economic data exists for managing these conditions across different European healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the management costs associated with acute and chronic phases of MI, IS, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) across eight European countries.
- To simulate the 2-year cost of managing patients with atherothrombotic disease in Europe.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of medical costs for MI and IS during acute and follow-up phases over two years using decision trees.
- Cost assessment employed diagnosis-related groups or national tariffs, informed by literature, statistics, and expert opinion (Delphi panel).
- Correlated costs with clinical trial data to estimate overall 2-year patient management expenses.
Main Results:
- Myocardial infarction (MI) management costs showed a 2-fold variation across countries (euro9512-18 293), with 47-76% for acute care.
- Ischaemic stroke (IS) costs exhibited a 10-fold difference (euro5607-56 370), with 18-75% allocated to follow-up care.
- Significant cost variations were observed in both acute and follow-up phases for MI and IS management.
Conclusions:
- Substantial differences exist in the overall costs and cost breakdowns for clinical management of MI and IS in Europe.
- These cost disparities are likely influenced by local treatment specificities and the availability of rehabilitation services.
- Future assessments of atherothrombotic disease management costs must consider the risk of ischaemic events across different vascular areas.
Background:
The clinical manifestations of atherothrombotic disease include ischaemic heart disease (including myocardial infarction [MI]) and cerebrovascular disease (including ischaemic stroke [IS]). Although costs generated by the clinical manifestations of atherothrombotic disease represent an important economic burden for any healthcare system, very few economic comparative data are available.
Objective:
To: (i) assess management costs of the different practice patterns for acute and chronic phases for MI, IS and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in eight European countries; and (ii) to simulate the cost of managing a patient with an atherothrombotic disease for 2 years in Europe.
Study Perspective:
Healthcare system.
Methods:
Firstly, the medical costs of managing MI and IS were analysed during the acute phase and subsequent 6-month periods over a total of 2 years. In each case, a decision tree was designed to indicate resource use. Assumptions concerning patient management and resource use were based on currently available local and international literature, official national statistics and local expert opinions (Delphi panel). Costs were assessed using diagnosis-related groups (Austria, Italy, Portugal and Sweden), or hospital databases and national tariffs (Belgium, France, Spain and Switzerland). Secondly, these costs were correlated to data from a large randomised clinical trial to estimate the overall cost per patient with atherothrombotic disease over a 2-year period.
Results:
For MI, there was a 2-fold difference in costs between the eight countries (euro9512-18 293), with 47-76% of costs devoted to acute management, 14-48% to follow-up management during the first year, and 4-17% to follow-up during the second year. For IS, there was a 10-fold difference (euro5607-56 370), with 18-75% devoted to follow-up for the years 1995-1997.
Conclusions:
There are differences in the overall costs and cost breakdown in the clinical management patterns of MI and IS in Europe. These differences seem to arise as a result of local treatment pattern specificities as well as the availability of specific and well-adapted structures for patients' rehabilitation. Further studies are necessary to fully explain these differences. The assessment of the total medical costs of managing an atherothrombotic patient over a 2-year period (MI, IS, established PAD) has to take into account the risk of ischaemic events in different vascular areas (MI, IS or major leg ischaemia).
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care