Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Involuntary competence.

Stephen J Morse¹

¹University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204, USA. smorse@law.upenn.edu

Behavioral Sciences & the Law

|June 17, 2003

Summary

The state can involuntarily medicate defendants to restore legal competence for trial. While individual rights are significant, this practice is permissible for most criminal defendants, ensuring fair trial remedies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Neurolaw: Challenges and limits.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2023

Same author

Remodelling criminal insanity: Exploring philosophical, legal, and medical premises of the medical model used in Norwegian law.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2022

Same author

The Structure, Function, and Future of Mental Health Law.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2021

Same author

The Science of Addiction and Criminal Law.

Harvard review of psychiatry·2017

Same author

Predicting the knowledge-recklessness distinction in the human brain.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2017

Same author

Law and neuroscience: recommendations submitted to the President's Bioethics Commission.

Journal of law and the biosciences·2014

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Legal Medicine
Medical Ethics

Background:

Competency to stand trial is a cornerstone of criminal due process.
Defendants have a qualified right to refuse psychotropic medication.
Balancing individual autonomy with state interests in legal proceedings is complex.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the constitutionality of involuntary medication for restoring competency.
To examine the legal and ethical considerations of medicating incompetent defendants.
To determine the state's right to administer psychotropic medication for trial competency.

Main Methods:

Constitutional law review.
Analysis of case precedents regarding patient rights and competency.
Examination of state interests versus individual liberty in criminal justice.

Main Results:

The state generally possesses the right to involuntarily medicate defendants to restore trial competency.
Individual interests in refusing medication are substantial but can be overridden.
Adequate safeguards can ensure a fair trial for medicated defendants.

Conclusions:

Involuntary medication is a justifiable state action for restoring competency in most criminal defendants.
Legal frameworks must balance defendant rights with the need for functional legal proceedings.
Procedural safeguards are essential to protect the rights of medicated defendants.

Related Experiment Videos