Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Complementary and alternative medicine: an integrated approach required.

John Ruedy1

  • 1Academic Affairs, Capital District Health Authority, Haifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Healthcarepapers
|June 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Scientific validation standards for health interventions should align with their underlying beliefs. Research funding should prioritize developing criteria for alternative therapies, understanding their effects, and ensuring safety and efficacy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Achievement of non-cognitive goals of undergraduate medical education: perceptions of medical students, residents, faculty and other health professionals.

Medical education·2004
Same author

Adverse events: past and future.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2004
Same author

Ten-year experience with mission-based budgeting in the faculty of medicine of Dalhousie University.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2003
Same author

Teaching of biomedical ethics in postgraduate training programs.

Annals (Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada)·1992

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Integrative and Complementary Medicine
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Current methods for verifying health intervention efficacy and safety must align with underlying health beliefs.
  • It is inappropriate to demand scientific validation for interventions not based on scientific principles.
  • Different validation standards for alternative health products used similarly to conventional drugs are unjustified.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for congruent validation methods for health interventions based on their underlying belief systems.
  • To argue for uniform standards in validating alternative health products.
  • To propose a research agenda for alternative therapies.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of validation requirements for health interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Argumentation for the "meaning" response and clinical/epidemiologic research.
  • Proposal for novel safety surveillance systems for alternative therapies.

    • Main Results:

    • Scientific validation is inappropriate for non-science-based interventions.
    • Alternative health products used like conventional drugs require similar validation standards.
    • Public research funding should focus on criteria for alternative interventions, the "meaning" response, and plausible therapies.

    Conclusions:

    • Validation methods must respect diverse health beliefs.
    • A new framework for evaluating alternative therapies is needed, prioritizing safety and efficacy.
    • Public health research should support evidence-based evaluation of alternative medicine.