Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
To justify or excuse?: A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations
John C Shaw1, Eric Wild, Jason A Colquitt
1Department of Management, Warrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-7165, USA. john.shaw@cba.ufl.edu
Abstract:
The authors used R. Folger and R. Cropanzano's (1998, 2001) fairness theory to derive predictions about the effects of explanation provision and explanation adequacy on justice judgments and cooperation, retaliation, and withdrawal responses. The authors also used the theory to identify potential moderators of those effects, including the type of explanation (justification vs. excuse), outcome favorability, and study context. The authors' predictions were tested by using meta-analyses of 54 independent samples. The results showed strong effects of explanations on both the justice and response variables. Moreover, explanations were more beneficial when they took the form of excuses rather than justifications, when they were given after unfavorable outcomes, and when they were given in contexts with instrumental, relational, and moral implications.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Statistical Significance
Confirmation Biases
Fundamental Attribution Error
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory