Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Context-dependent foraging decisions in rufous hummingbirds.

Melissa Bateson1, Susan D Healy, T Andrew Hurly

  • 1Evolution and Behaviour Research Group, School of Biology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Henry Wellcome Building for Neuroecology, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. melissa.bateson@ncl.ac.uk

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|June 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is the association between food insecurity and depression mediated by diet?

Appetite·2026
Same author

Nest building as a missing piece in biparental care.

Biology letters·2026
Same author

The role of personal reproductive experience on nest building in a wild bird.

Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology·2026
Same author

Does food insecurity cause anxiety and depression? Evidence from the changing cost of living study.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

Dynamic strategic social learning in nest-building zebra finches and its generalizability.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Ability to predict irregular periods of food depriviation improves body-weight regulation and reduces weight gain in food-insecure starlings.

Royal Society open science·2025

Rufous hummingbirds may use relative valuation, not absolute, when making foraging decisions. Their preferences shifted when decoy options were introduced, similar to human choice behavior.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Animal Cognition
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Economic models often assume animals make choices based on absolute utility.
  • Humans sometimes deviate, using relative valuation influenced by available options.
  • Emerging evidence suggests animals may also employ relative choice mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) utilize relative valuation in foraging decisions.
  • To test if hummingbird preferences are influenced by the presence of decoy options, analogous to human choice studies.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of artificial flower choices presented to hummingbirds.
  • Three treatments: binary choice (concentration vs. volume) and two trinary choices with decoy options.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantification of foraging preferences under different choice set compositions.

    • Main Results:

    • Hummingbird preferences significantly differed across the three treatments.
    • Decoy options in trinary treatments increased preference for the option that dominated the decoy.
    • Observed choice patterns mirrored those seen in human relative valuation studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Rufous hummingbirds' foraging choices are consistent with a relative evaluation mechanism.
    • This suggests that relative valuation may be more widespread in animal decision-making than previously assumed.
    • Findings challenge the universality of absolute utility assumptions in animal economic models.