Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

Murine Bilateral Renal Lymphadenectomy
Published on: December 30, 2025
LDL-apheresis and immunoadsorption: novel methods in the treatment of renal diseases refractory to conventional
Władysław Sułowicz1, Tomasz Stompór
1Chair and Department of Nephrology, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland. wladsul@mp.pl
Plasma exchange was used for many years as the method of extracorporeal removal of antibodies and/or immune complexes that may be involved in the pathogenesis of renal diseases. Recently low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis and immunoadsorption were also introduced into nephrological practice. LDL-apheresis, designed originally as a rescue treatment for refractory hyperlipidaemia, appeared also to be effective in certain glomerulopathies, resistant to other treatment strategies. Similarly, immunoadsorption can be employed successfully in the treatment of different nephropathies, of both immunological and non-immunological pathogenesis. This method may also be effective as rescue treatment in some cases of acute rejection and recurrence of certain nephropathies after renal transplantation. The major advantage of both methods is their increased selectivity compared with standard plasma exchange. In addition, these techniques need no supplement fluid (namely fresh frozen plasma), which allows for markedly increased efficacy of the treatment as well as substantial reduction of infection risks.
Plasma exchange was used for many years as the method of extracorporeal removal of antibodies and/or immune complexes that may be involved in the pathogenesis of renal diseases. Recently low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis and immunoadsorption were also introduced into nephrological practice. LDL-apheresis, designed originally as a rescue treatment for refractory hyperlipidaemia, appeared also to be effective in certain glomerulopathies, resistant to other treatment strategies. Similarly, immunoadsorption can be employed successfully in the treatment of different nephropathies, of both immunological and non-immunological pathogenesis. This method may also be effective as rescue treatment in some cases of acute rejection and recurrence of certain nephropathies after renal transplantation. The major advantage of both methods is their increased selectivity compared with standard plasma exchange. In addition, these techniques need no supplement fluid (namely fresh frozen plasma), which allows for markedly increased efficacy of the treatment as well as substantial reduction of infection risks.
Related Concept Videos
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy