Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Developing a Salivary Antibody Multiplex Immunoassay to Measure Human Exposure to Environmental Pathogens
Published on: September 12, 2016
Infectious diseases detected at autopsy at an urban public hospital, 1996-2001
Lian A Bonds1, Loretta Gaido, Jan E Woods
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Services, Denver Health Medical Center, Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA.
Abstract:
Previous studies have demonstrated significant discrepancy rates between clinical and autopsy diagnoses. However, infectious diseases have not received emphasis in these studies. We conducted a study to determine whether the clinical and autopsy diagnoses of infectious diseases are concordant or discrepant and to determine discrepancy rates. Retrospective reviews of the records of 276 patients (adults, 182; fetuses and neonates, 94) who underwent autopsy during the years 1996 through 2001 were performed. Comparison of clinical and autopsy diagnoses was performed using the Goldman classification scheme. Of 182 adult patients, 137 (75.3%) had an infectious disease at autopsy. In 59 (43.1%) of 137 patients, the infectious disease diagnoses were unknown clinically. Of 94 fetuses and neonates, 45 (48%) had an infectious disease at autopsy. In 26 (58%) of 45 patients, the infectious disease diagnoses were unknown before death. There are substantial discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of infectious diseases. In adults, acute bronchopneumonia is the infectious disease most often missed clinically; in fetuses and neonates, it is acute chorioamnionitis.
Insights
Clinical and autopsy diagnoses for infectious diseases show significant discrepancies. Many infectious disease cases, particularly acute bronchopneumonia in adults and acute chorioamnionitis in neonates, were missed during clinical evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Pathology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Previous research highlights diagnostic discrepancies between clinical assessments and autopsy findings.
- However, the specific impact on diagnosing infectious diseases remains under-explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concordance between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of infectious diseases.
- To determine the discrepancy rates for infectious disease diagnoses in adult and pediatric populations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 276 patient records (182 adults, 94 fetuses/neonates) undergoing autopsy (1996-2001).
- Application of the Goldman classification scheme for comparing clinical and autopsy diagnoses.
- Analysis of infectious disease prevalence and clinical underdiagnosis.
Main Results:
- Infectious diseases were present in 75.3% of autopsied adults and 48% of fetuses/neonates.
- Clinical diagnoses missed infectious diseases in 43.1% of adult cases and 58% of fetal/neonatal cases.
- Acute bronchopneumonia (adults) and acute chorioamnionitis (fetuses/neonates) were the most frequently missed diagnoses.
Conclusions:
- Substantial discrepancies exist between clinical and autopsy diagnoses of infectious diseases.
- Improved clinical recognition and diagnostic strategies for infectious diseases are warranted, especially for specific conditions in different age groups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Toxoplasmosis

