Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A computer-based method for comparisons of continuous intracranial pressure recordings within individual cases.

P K Eide1, A D Fremming

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital, University of Oslo, Sensometrics AS, Oslo, Norway. per.kristian.eide@rikshospitalet.no

Acta Neurochirurgica
|June 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Comparing intracranial pressure (ICP) elevations after surgery is more reliable for predicting outcomes than mean ICP. This method significantly improved prediction accuracy in pediatric craniosynostosis cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shunt-related cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage - a multicentre consensus definition.

Acta neurochirurgica·2026
Same author

Prospective Safety Study of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Different Doses.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023
Same author

Intrathecal Use of Gadobutrol for Glymphatic MR Imaging: Prospective Safety Study of 100 Patients.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same author

European Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia.

European journal of neurology·2019
Same author

Astrogliosis and impaired aquaporin-4 and dystrophin systems in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Neuropathology and applied neurobiology·2017
Same author

Reply: To PMID 25977480.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2015

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

Background:

  • Assessing continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings is crucial for managing neurological conditions.
  • Two methods for comparing ICP data exist: mean ICP differences and ICP elevation count differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of two distinct strategies for comparing intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings.
  • To determine which ICP comparison method better predicts patient outcomes post-craniosynostosis surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Continuous ICP monitoring was performed before and after cranial expansion surgery in 15 children.
  • ICP data were analyzed for mean pressure and the number of elevations (≥20/25 mmHg for 0.5/1 min).
  • ICP elevation counts were standardized to a 10-hour period to account for variable recording lengths.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mean ICP reduction (>2 mmHg) predicted good outcomes in 20% of cases.
  • Significant reduction in ICP elevations predicted good outcomes in 80% of cases.
  • Numbers of ICP elevations were significantly reduced post-surgery in 14 out of 15 patients.

Conclusions:

  • Comparing differences in the number of ICP elevations is a more reliable predictor of surgical outcomes than comparing mean ICP.
  • This finding has significant implications for post-operative ICP monitoring and patient management strategies.