Racial differences in outcome in the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT): a comparison of whites versus

Andrea M Russo1, Gail E Hafley, Kerry L Lee

  • 1University of Pennsylvania Health System, Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. andrea_russo@uphs.upenn.edu

Circulation
|June 25, 2003
PubMed

Insights

Race influenced outcomes in the MUSTT trial. Electrophysiologically-guided therapy benefited whites but not blacks, partly due to higher implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in whites.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Health Disparities

Background:

  • The Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT) established implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) benefits for coronary disease patients with reduced ejection fraction.
  • Prior research indicates racial disparities in sudden cardiac death risk among ischemic heart disease patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of race on the outcomes of the MUSTT trial.
  • To analyze how race influences the effectiveness of electrophysiologically-guided therapy and ICD implantation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the Multicenter UnSustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT) data.
  • Comparison of outcomes based on race (White vs. Black) and treatment assignment (EP-guided vs. no EP-guided therapy).

Main Results:

  • White patients had higher rates of prior revascularization and inducible ventricular arrhythmias compared to Black patients.
  • Electrophysiologically (EP)-guided therapy reduced arrhythmic death/cardiac arrest and total mortality in Whites, but not in Blacks.
  • Black patients receiving no EP-guided therapy showed better survival than those receiving EP-guided therapy, potentially linked to lower ICD implantation rates in Black patients.

Conclusions:

  • Race significantly influenced trial outcomes and the benefit derived from EP-guided therapy.
  • Differences in ICD implantation rates, arrhythmic substrates, and proarrhythmic responses to antiarrhythmic drugs may explain the observed racial disparities in outcomes.
Abstract