Related Experiment Videos
Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures
Timothy D Hackenberg1, Manish Vaidya
1Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-2250, USA. hack1@ufl.edu
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|June 26, 2003
Summary
Pigeons preferred immediate smaller rewards when delays were shorter for them, but preferred larger rewards when delays were equal. This highlights how reinforcer immediacy and amount influence self-control choices.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Animal Cognition
Background:
- Self-control is the ability to forgo immediate smaller rewards for larger delayed rewards.
- Token-based procedures offer a way to study self-control by separating reinforcement delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how exchange delays and food delays affect choice behavior in a token-based self-control task.
- To determine the relative influence of reinforcer immediacy versus amount on pigeons' choices.
Main Methods:
- Four pigeons were trained on a token-based self-control procedure.
- Tokens were exchanged for food access, with varying delays to the exchange stimulus and food delivery.
- Exchange and food delays were manipulated independently and concurrently.
Main Results:
- A strong preference for smaller, immediate reinforcers emerged when both exchange and food delays were shorter for them.
- A strong preference for larger reinforcers emerged when delays were equal for both options.
- Manipulating exchange and food delays separately influenced preference, but less extremely than when both favored one option.
Conclusions:
- Reinforcer immediacy is a key factor when exchange and food delays are unequal.
- Reinforcer amount is more influential when exchange and food delays are equal.
- The exchange stimulus may function as a conditioned reinforcer, supporting self-control.