Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confounding by indication: implications for implant research.

Lisa B Signorello1, Joseph K McLaughlin, Loren Lipworth

  • 1International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.

Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants
|June 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sampling strategies for selecting general population comparison cohorts.

Clinical epidemiology·2018
Same author

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and cardiovascular events in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and multiple myeloma.

Clinical epidemiology·2018
Same author

Retinal vein thrombosis and risk of occult cancer: A nationwide cohort study.

Cancer medicine·2018
Same author

KRAS mutation status, comorbidity, and mortality in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Denmark.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2018
Same author

Risk of bleeding and arterial cardiovascular events in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis in Denmark: a population-based cohort study.

The Lancet. Haematology·2018
Same author

Diclofenac use and cardiovascular risks: series of nationwide cohort studies.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2018
Same journal

Impact of Subgingival Lactobacillus reuteri Probiotic Therapy on Clinical Outcomes and Porphyromonas gingivalis Quantification in Peri-Implant Disease: A Prospective RT-PCR-Based Clinical Study.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants·2026
Same journal

Prevalence of Peri-Implant Disease in Treated Chronic Periodontitis Patients on Supportive Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation After 1 Year of Implant Function.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants·2026
Same journal

Hormonal Transition and Osseointegration: Evaluating the Nexus between Vitamin D Status and Peri-Implant Health and Disease in Women.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants·2026
Same journal

Therapeutic Impact of Systemic Probiotics Combined with Mechanical Debridement in Peri-Implant Disease: A Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants·2026
Same journal

A Comprehensive Histomorphometric and Surface Roughness Evaluation of Sandblasted Acid-Etched (SLA) Titanium Alloy Implants: Perspectives from an Experimental Rabbit Osseointegration Analysis.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants·2026
Same journal

Flapless Graft-Free Sinus Floor Elevation Simultaneously with the Placement of a Dental Implant "Aldary Technique": A Case Report with 5 Years Follow-Up.

Journal of long-term effects of medical implants·2026
See all related articles

Observational studies on prosthetic implants and connective tissue disease are likely biased due to "confounding by indication." This bias occurs because patients receiving implants often have different underlying health issues than control groups, affecting results.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Medical device research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Assessing adverse effects of medical/surgical treatments, including prosthetic implants, requires isolating treatment effects from underlying illness.
  • Treatment assignment for surgical implants is typically non-random, based on clinical indications related to pre-existing medical conditions.
  • Differences in baseline risks, comorbidities, and prognostic factors between treated and untreated groups can introduce bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine observational epidemiologic studies investigating associations between prosthetic implants and connective tissue disease.
  • To demonstrate the impact of confounding by indication on the interpretation of implant research findings.
  • To underscore the necessity of understanding and accounting for confounding by indication in implant research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Review and critical analysis of existing observational epidemiologic studies on prosthetic implants and connective tissue disease.
  • Identification and evaluation of methods used to control for confounding factors in these studies.
  • Assessment of the adequacy of bias control for confounding by indication.

Main Results:

  • Several observational studies suggest associations between prosthetic implants and subsequent connective tissue disease.
  • None of the examined studies adequately accounted for confounding by indication.
  • Findings from these studies are likely biased due to insufficient control for inherent differences between study groups.

Conclusions:

  • Confounding by indication is a significant bias in observational studies of prosthetic implants.
  • Inadequate control for this bias leads to potentially erroneous conclusions about implant safety.
  • Proper understanding and management of confounding by indication are crucial for accurate interpretation of implant research, especially given the increasing use of implants at younger ages.