Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An indirect method of measuring widths suitable for automated bone histomorphometry.

W E Huffer1, R B Lepoff

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research : the Official Journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
|December 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Osteoinduction with COLLOSS, COLLOSS E, and GFm.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2006
Same author

Six-year trends in productivity and utilization of 73 clinical laboratories: a College of American Pathologists Laboratory Management Index Program study.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2001
Same author

Preliminary in vivo studies on the osteogenic potential of bone morphogenetic proteins delivered from an absorbable puttylike polymer matrix.

Journal of biomedical materials research·2000
Same author

Combination of osteoinductive bone proteins differentiates mesenchymal C3H/10T1/2 cells specifically to the cartilage lineage.

Journal of cellular biochemistry·1997
Same author

Elucidation of homeoprotein Cart-1 function during in vitro chondrogenesis of C3H10T1/2 micromass cultures.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1996
Same author

[Bone histomorphometry study in post-menopausal women with osteopenia].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi·1995

The area/length (Ar/Le) method for measuring osteoid seam width is comparable to direct orthogonal intercept methods. This technique is suitable for automated histomorphometry, offering reliable results with smaller variance.

Area of Science:

  • Histomorphometry
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of osteoid seam width is crucial in histomorphometry.
  • Traditional methods like orthogonal intercepts can be labor-intensive and prone to variability.
  • Developing automated and reliable measurement techniques is essential for efficient research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and reliability of the area/length (Ar/Le) method with traditional orthogonal intercept methods (OIr, O সুস্পষ্ট) for determining osteoid seam widths.
  • To evaluate the suitability of the Ar/Le method for automated histomorphometry.
  • To assess the impact of image digitization and thresholding on width measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Manual and computer-based measurements of artificial profiles and human osteoid seams.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized three measurement approaches: orthogonal intercepts from random test lines (OIr), uniformly distributed intercepts (OIu), and areas and lengths (Ar/Le).
  • Analyzed individual and sample widths, variances, and distribution characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • Individual widths measured by Ar/Le and OIu methods were equal.
    • Mean profile widths across all methods, and mean orthogonal intercepts (OIu, OIr) were consistent.
    • Ar/Le and OIu methods exhibited smaller variance compared to OIr.
    • Thresholding corrected discrepancies in digitized images without significantly affecting sample means.
    • Unweighted Ar/Le sample means were 15-44% lower than weighted means, indicating the importance of weighting.
    • Osteoid seam width distributions were often non-normal and multimodal.

    Conclusions:

    • The Ar/Le method provides comparable results to direct orthogonal intercept methods for osteoid seam width determination.
    • The Ar/Le method is suitable for automated histomorphometry, offering a reliable alternative to manual techniques.
    • Careful consideration of weighting and image processing is necessary for accurate Ar/Le measurements.