Related Experiment Videos
How patients feel about prolonged mechanical ventilation 1 year later
Aaron B Mendelsohn1, Steven H Belle, Baruch Fischhoff
1Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, PA, USA.
Critical Care Medicine
|June 28, 2003
Summary
Most patients would choose mechanical ventilation again, but pain and family financial burden significantly influence this decision. Younger and healthier individuals are more likely to favor mechanical ventilation.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Medical Decision-Making
Background:
- Prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-sustaining intervention for critically ill patients.
- Patient preferences regarding MV are crucial for informed decision-making and end-of-life care.
- Understanding factors influencing these preferences is essential for personalized critical care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the preferences of patients who previously underwent prolonged mechanical ventilation regarding this therapy.
- To identify patient characteristics associated with mechanical ventilation preferences.
- To assess how the intensive care unit (ICU) experience influences these preferences.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study involving 133 patients who survived 12 months after prolonged mechanical ventilation (>/=48 hours).
- Patients reflected on their actual MV experiences and evaluated hypothetical scenarios.
- Data collected on patient demographics, health status, and perceived pain, familial financial burden, and stress.
Main Results:
- 86.5% of patients would have chosen mechanical ventilation again.
- Younger and healthier patients were more likely to favor mechanical ventilation.
- Approximately 25% of patients would have refused MV if faced with significant family financial burden or increased pain/discomfort.
Conclusions:
- While most survivors would opt for mechanical ventilation, patient characteristics significantly impact this choice.
- Pain and family financial burden are critical factors that could lead patients to refuse life-sustaining MV.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering patient values and socioeconomic factors in critical care decisions.