Comparison of staining and concentration techniques for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in cat faecal specimens
M M Mtambo1, A S Nash, D A Blewett
1Department of Veterinary Medicine, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, UK.
Abstract:
Modified Ziehl-Neelsen (MZN), auramine-phenol (A-P) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled (FITC-labelled) monoclonal antibody (MAb) techniques were compared for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in cat faecal specimens inoculated with known numbers of C. parvum oocysts. Of the three techniques, the FITC-labelled MAb technique detected more oocysts than the MZN and A-P techniques (P < 0.05), but A-P was more efficient than MZN (P < 0.05). Comparison of sucrose flotation, zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) flotation and formol-ether (F-E) sedimentation techniques revealed that F-E was the most efficient of the three (P < 0.05) for concentration of C. parvum oocysts from cat faecal specimens. On average, the F-E technique recovered 37% of oocysts from the original sample, whereas the sucrose and ZnSO4 flotation techniques recovered 33% and 11%, respectively. The findings of this study suggest that MZN and A-P staining are both useful for screening C. parvum oocysts in cat faecal materials containing 10(6) oocysts or more, but FITC-labelled MAb should be used when the number of oocysts is low. Also, the F-E sedimentation technique is recommended for concentrating oocysts in cat faecal specimens.
Related Concept Videos
Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
Simple Staining Technique
Differential Staining Technique
Special Staining Techniques


