Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Comparison of information about the quality of apparel in three retail formats
Elizabeth K Bye1, Kathryn Reiley
1University of Minnesota, USA. ebye@che.umn.edu
Abstract:
Multiple options are available for selection and purchase of apparel including in-store, catalogue, and Internet. The present purpose was to compare information about quality available to consumers in three retail formats. Students studying quality of apparel selected a product which could be purchased in each of the three formats, completed an evaluation from both a consumer's and preprofessional perspective, and made recommendations for improving information on quality. A total of 413 recommendations were categorized and tested for independence. Students had similar expectations for cues of quality across Internet, catalogue, and in-store formats including fiber content, country of origin, 3-dimensional information about fit, color accuracy, size charts, and strong customer service. Students expected a uniform array of information on quality regardless of the shopping format. Merchandisers must be aware of the total image across formats and be prepared to explore methods for improving communication of information on quality in each.
Related Concept Videos
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Relative Frequency Histogram
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

