Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking secondary structure prediction for fold recognition.

Liam J McGuffin1, David T Jones

  • 1Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom. l.mcguffin@cs.ucl.ac.uk

Proteins
|July 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the clinical trial landscape for patients with atypical variants of Alzheimer's disease: a call to action.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Overnight sleep features and next-morning brain metabolism in older adults.

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

Tau topography subtypes account for clinical heterogeneity and longitudinal trajectories in early-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

On the state of protein function prediction: a report on the fourth CAFA challenge.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Cognitive dispersion profiles and prediction of cognitive change in early-onset dementias: Results from LEADS.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Criterion and convergent validity of plasma biomarkers in early-onset Alzheimer's disease: Initial findings from LEADS.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same journal

Engineered HSP90-MP65 Bivalent Fusion Antigen: A Novel Vaccine Candidate Against Invasive Candidiasis.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Physics-Based Energy Functions for Computational Protein Design.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Stabilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at Physiological pH: Contrasting Roles of CHAPS and Arginine in Aggregation Inhibition.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Generalizing the Gaussian Network Model: Spanning-Tree Thermodynamics Shows Entropy-Driven KRAS Activation.

Proteins·2026
See all related articles

Errors in predicted protein secondary structures significantly impact fold recognition. Missing or misclassified elements are more detrimental than length inaccuracies, suggesting secondary structure alignment scoring can assess prediction quality.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Bioinformatics
  • Protein Structure Prediction

Background:

  • Secondary structure predictions are crucial for protein fold recognition.
  • Understanding error types in predictions is essential for improving accuracy.
  • Existing fold recognition methods need robust secondary structure integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically compare secondary structure prediction methods.
  • To evaluate the impact of specific error types on fold recognition sensitivity.
  • To assess the utility of secondary structure alignment scoring for prediction quality.

Main Methods:

  • Measured frequencies of specific error types across different prediction methods.
  • Evaluated the effect of these errors on secondary structure element alignment (SSEA).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed SSEA's performance as a baseline fold recognition method.

    • Main Results:

    • Missing entire helices or strands, and predicting incorrect element types, severely reduce fold recognition sensitivity.
    • Predicting incorrect element lengths or overpredicting helices/strands have less impact.
    • SSEA scoring effectively reflects secondary structure prediction accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Certain secondary structure prediction errors are more detrimental to fold recognition than others.
    • SSEA scoring is a valuable tool for assessing secondary structure prediction quality.
    • This assessment method can guide the development of more effective fold recognition strategies.