Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Case-study analysis of various field study measures.

Jill E Preminger1, David R Cunningham

  • 1University of Louisville School of Medicine, Program in Audiology, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|July 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introduction for the 5th International Meeting on Internet and Audiology Special Issue of the <i>American Journal of Audiology</i>.

American journal of audiology·2022
Same author

Audiological approaches to address the psychosocial needs of adults with hearing loss: perceived benefit and likelihood of use.

International journal of audiology·2020
Same author

The Development of an Internet-Based Decision Coaching Guide to Encourage Audiology Care: The Results of a Participatory Design Approach.

American journal of audiology·2020
Same author

Identifying the approaches used by audiologists to address the psychosocial needs of their adult clients.

International journal of audiology·2020
Same author

Introduction for the 4th International Meeting on Internet and Audiology Special Issue of the <i>American Journal of Audiology</i>.

American journal of audiology·2020
Same author

Adult Children's Perspectives on Their Role in Their Parent's Hearing Healthcare Processes.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2018
Same journal

Psychometric Rigor Before Clinical or Research Implementation.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

American Academy of Audiology Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification for Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review Protocol.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Evidence Synthesis and Open Science: A Tutorial for Systematic Reviews and Beyond in Audiology Research.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

State and Trait Anxiety Alter Postural Control in Healthy Adults.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
Same journal

Test-Retest Reliability of the Triangle Completion Test.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluated field measures for hearing aid users. Paired comparison techniques demonstrated the best reliability, sensitivity, and validity for assessing speech clarity.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Hearing Science
  • Speech Perception

Background:

  • Assessing the effectiveness of hearing aid fittings in real-world environments is crucial for improving user satisfaction and hearing outcomes.
  • Subjective rating techniques and self-assessment scales are commonly used, but their psychometric properties require rigorous evaluation.
  • Understanding the reliability, sensitivity, and validity of these measures is essential for accurate clinical assessment and research.

Observation:

  • Eight participants with hearing loss evaluated two distinct hearing aid Frequency-Gain-Characteristics (FGCs) in their daily lives over six weeks.
  • During the field study, participants utilized either category ratings or paired comparisons weekly, alongside completing two self-assessment scales.
  • Laboratory-based speech clarity ratings served as the criterion measure for comparison with field study results.

Related Experiment Videos

Findings:

  • The paired comparison technique exhibited superior psychometric characteristics compared to category ratings and self-assessment scales in this field study.
  • This suggests that paired comparisons are a more reliable and valid method for assessing subjective experiences with hearing aid settings in real-world conditions.
  • The study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate subjective measures for capturing meaningful differences in perceived speech clarity.

Implications:

  • The findings support the use of paired comparison techniques as a robust tool for audiological research and clinical practice when evaluating hearing aid performance.
  • Improved subjective measures can lead to more precise hearing aid fittings, enhancing speech understanding and quality of life for individuals with hearing loss.
  • Further research could explore the generalizability of these findings across different hearing aid technologies and diverse user populations.