Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Proteomic tools for quantitation by mass spectrometry.

Jennie Lill1

  • 1ActivX Biosciences, 11025 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Jenniel@activx.com

Mass Spectrometry Reviews
|July 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Survey Outcome on Immunogenicity Risk Assessment Tools for Biotherapeutics: an Insight into Consensus on Methods, Application, and Utility in Drug Development.

The AAPS journal·2023
Same author

Proteomic Analyses Identify a Novel Role for EZH2 in the Initiation of Cancer Cell Drug Tolerance.

Journal of proteome research·2020
Same author

The tumor suppressor BAP1 cooperates with BRAFV600E to promote tumor formation in cutaneous melanoma.

Pigment cell & melanoma research·2018
Same author

Response to Comment on "SUMO deconjugation is required for arsenic-triggered ubiquitylation of PML".

Science signaling·2016
Same author

IgRepertoireConstructor: a novel algorithm for antibody repertoire construction and immunoproteogenomics analysis.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2015
Same author

IgSimulator: a versatile immunosequencing simulator.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2015

Accurate protein and peptide quantitation using mass spectrometry (MS) relies on various labeling techniques. Metabolic labeling offers the most precise results for comparative studies when using cultured cells.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Proteomics

Background:

  • Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for protein and peptide quantitation.
  • Accurate quantification is crucial for various biological and biomedical applications.
  • Different labeling strategies exist, each with specific advantages and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare various techniques for protein and peptide quantitation by mass spectrometry.
  • To discuss labeling processes including metabolic, enzymatic, and chemical methods.
  • To present methods for both comparative and absolute quantitation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on protein and peptide quantitation using mass spectrometry.
  • Discussion of different isotopic labeling strategies: metabolic, enzymatic, and chemical.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of techniques for comparative and absolute quantitation.

    • Main Results:

    • Metabolic incorporation of isotopic labels is identified as the most accurate labeling strategy.
    • This technique is particularly useful for comparative quantitation when an internal standard is required.
    • The primary limitation of metabolic labeling is its applicability restricted to cultured cells.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of labeling technique depends on the specific research question and experimental system.
    • Metabolic labeling provides high accuracy for comparative quantitation in cell culture studies.
    • Further research may be needed to overcome limitations of current techniques for broader applications.