Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

[Evaluating health interventions without experiments].

M Vera-Hernández1

  • 1Department of Economics, University College London. London. United Kingdom. uctpamv@ucl.ac.uk

Gaceta Sanitaria
|July 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Frequency of HIV-testing and factors associated with multiple lifetime HIV-testing among a rural population of Zambian men.

BMC public health·2015
Same journal

[New capacities and digital transformation of patients with complex chronic conditions (DAIPO). Study protocol].

Gaceta sanitaria·2026
Same journal

[Estimation of secondhand smoke exposure: the impact of question wording].

Gaceta sanitaria·2026
Same journal

[Comprehensive policies without implementation or resources: the European discrepancy on childhood obesity].

Gaceta sanitaria·2026
Same journal

[A national palliative care law in Spain: a matter of equity and public health].

Gaceta sanitaria·2026
Same journal

[The institutionalization of public health in Spain (II)].

Gaceta sanitaria·2026
Same journal

[Coordination of self-employed community healthcare professionals with the public healthcare system. SESPAS Report 2026].

Gaceta sanitaria·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study reviews quantitative methods for evaluating non-experimental health reforms. It details matching and difference-in-differences techniques, focusing on heterogeneous treatment effects for improved health economics and management.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Management
  • Quantitative Analysis

Context:

  • Evaluation of non-experimental reforms in healthcare.
  • Application of quantitative techniques in health economics and management.
  • Focus on reforms with heterogeneous treatment effects.

Purpose:

  • Summarize recent literature on quantitative evaluation techniques for non-experimental reforms.
  • Detail matching and difference-in-differences methods, including combinations.
  • Emphasize estimation of the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT).

Summary:

  • Reviews quantitative methods for evaluating non-experimental health reforms.
  • Analyzes matching and difference-in-differences techniques in detail.
  • Assumes heterogeneous treatment effects across individuals.

Related Experiment Videos

Impact:

  • Provides accessible overview of advanced evaluation methods.
  • Aids researchers and policymakers in health economics and management.
  • Facilitates understanding of reform impact estimation with unobserved heterogeneity.