Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rubella virus strains show no major antigenic differences.

J M Best1, A Thomson, J R Nores

  • 1Department of Virology, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

Intervirology
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multimodal Biomarkers That Predict the Presence of Gleason Pattern 4: Potential Impact for Active Surveillance.

The Journal of urology·2023
Same author

Out of our comfort zone.

British dental journal·2020
Same author

Patient blood management - a new paradigm for transfusion medicine?

ISBT science series·2020
Same author

Recruitment and retention.

British dental journal·2020
Same author

Adapting to current trends.

British dental journal·2019
Same author

Enhanced monocyte recruitment and delayed alternative macrophage polarization accompanies impaired repair following myocardial infarction in C57BL/6 compared to BALB/c mice.

Clinical and experimental immunology·2019

Rubella virus strains showed no antigenic differences. This confirms that current rubella vaccines protect against wild strains and that diagnostic tests can detect antibodies from all rubella virus types.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Immunology
  • Vaccinology

Background:

  • Rubella virus causes a significant public health concern.
  • Understanding rubella virus antigenic stability is crucial for vaccine efficacy and diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential antigenic variations among wild-type and vaccine strains of rubella virus.
  • To confirm the protective efficacy of existing rubella vaccines against diverse circulating strains.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of five wild-type rubella virus strains (1964-1987, UK, USA, Japan) and four attenuated vaccine strains.
  • Utilized a panel of 28 monoclonal antibodies across multiple assays: neutralization, haemagglutination-inhibition, enzyme immunoassay, and indirect immunofluorescence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant antigenic differences were detected among the tested rubella virus strains.
  • Monoclonal antibody reactivity was consistent across wild-type and vaccine rubella virus isolates.

Conclusions:

  • Current rubella vaccines are effective in protecting against circulating wild-type rubella virus strains.
  • Rubella virus antigens used in serological screening and diagnostic tests are reliable for detecting antibodies induced by all rubella virus strains.