Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Female genital cutting: a harmless practice?

Gerry Mackie1

  • 1Social and Political Theory Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.

Medical Anthropology Quarterly
|July 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why context matters for social norms interventions: The case of child marriage in Cameroon.

Global public health·2019
Same author

A Spatial Analysis of the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among 0-14-Year-Old Girls in Kenya.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2019
Same author

Social norms and child marriage in Cameroon: An application of the theory of normative spectrum.

Global public health·2019
Same journal

Inoculating whiteness: Vaccines, racial formation, and settler colonial immunity on Lingít Aaní.

Medical anthropology quarterly·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic use in Türkiye: Everyday encounters of translating policy and negotiating rationality.

Medical anthropology quarterly·2026
Same journal

"They need to get a new program": Experiential frictions with the gender of care in the 12 step program for ethnically Mexican women.

Medical anthropology quarterly·2026
Same journal

"Buprenorphine doesn't hold me": Neurochemical afterlives of state violence and the struggle for meaning in addiction treatment.

Medical anthropology quarterly·2026
Same journal

Border tuberculosis: Migrant tuberculosis screenings and the enactment of disease in the Indonesia-Malaysia migration corridor.

Medical anthropology quarterly·2026
Same journal

The role of Abuela Doulas in advancing reproductive justice in the UK.

Medical anthropology quarterly·2026
See all related articles

Female genital cutting (FGC) is harmful, despite claims of minimal harm. This practice irreversibly reduces a key human capacity without meaningful consent, warranting significant concern.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Anthropology
  • Public Health
  • Human Rights

Background:

  • A 1999 article in Medical Anthropology Quarterly questioned the evidence for harmful effects of female genital cutting (FGC).
  • The article proposed FGC may be of minimal harm, citing education levels, practice persistence, and the social construction of clitoral function.
  • These hypotheses suggest a need to re-evaluate the established understanding of FGC's impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge hypotheses suggesting female genital cutting (FGC) is of minimal harm.
  • To argue that FGC is indeed harmful by appropriate evaluative standards.
  • To assert that FGC is a significant concern due to irreversible harm and lack of consent.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing arguments and evidence regarding female genital cutting (FGC).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical evaluation of FGC based on human capacity and consent.
  • Rebuttal of specific hypotheses presented in prior literature.

    • Main Results:

    • The hypotheses suggesting minimal harm from female genital cutting (FGC) are found to be unsupported.
    • Female genital cutting (FGC) is demonstrably harmful when evaluated by appropriate standards.
    • The practice constitutes an irreversible reduction of a human capacity without meaningful consent.

    Conclusions:

    • Female genital cutting (FGC) poses significant harm and is a critical public health and human rights issue.
    • The arguments for minimal harm are refuted, reinforcing the need for intervention.
    • The irreversible nature and lack of consent underscore the ethical imperative to address FGC.