Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Uncertainty orientation in the group context: categorization effects on persuasive message processing.

Gordon Hodson1, Richard M Sorrentino

  • 1Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. g.hodson@swansea.ac.uk

The Journal of Social Psychology
|July 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contact ruptures: How ecological shifts reshape intergroup contact and outgroup attitudes.

The American psychologist·2025
Same author

Primary and secondary generalization effects from Black and gay contact: Longitudinal evidence of between- and within-person effects.

The British journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer (1940-2024).

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Attitudes Toward Cisgender Women's Participation in Sex Work: Opportunity for Agency or Harmful Exchange?

Archives of sexual behavior·2024
Same author

Replicating and extending Sengupta et al. (2023): Contact predicts no within-person longitudinal outgroup-bias change.

The American psychologist·2023
Same author

A cautionary note on interpreting research findings in the presence of statistical suppression.

The Journal of social psychology·2023
Same journal

War and Terrorism Perceptions a Decade Later: Target Distinction or Ethnic-Cultural Bias?

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

You Must Eat Less Meat! Effects of Issue Importance on Reactance to Meat-Reduction Messages.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Distributed Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Healthcare: Moderated Mediation of Psychological Capital and Emotional Exhaustion.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Threat-Induced Conservatism in a Liberal Electorate: Issue-Based Shifts without Ideological Transformation.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring schadenfreude from the perspectives of deservingness and terror management theories.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Shame, Humiliation and Pride on Revenge Desire and Behavior in Victims of Crime: A Pilot Experimental Study.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
See all related articles

People process persuasive messages differently based on their personality and whether the message aligns with their social group. Uncertainty orientation influences how individuals handle conflicting social information.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Communication Studies
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Persuasive messages can come from in-groups or out-groups.
  • In-group sources may trigger heuristic or systematic processing due to attractiveness or relevance.
  • Individual differences in uncertainty orientation and social expectancy congruence are key factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how uncertainty orientation and social expectancy congruence affect message processing.
  • To understand how individuals process in-group versus out-group persuasive messages.
  • To explore the role of personality in responding to social categorization conflicts.

Main Methods:

  • Participants were exposed to strong or weak persuasive messages.
  • Messages were categorized as in-group or out-group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Messages varied in expectancy congruence (agreement/disagreement).
  • Individual differences in uncertainty orientation were measured.

    • Main Results:

    • Uncertainty-oriented individuals increased systematic processing when messages were incongruent.
    • Certainty-oriented individuals processed systematically only under congruent conditions.
    • Social categorization conflicts influenced processing based on personality.

    Conclusions:

    • Uncertainty created by social categorization conflicts is processed differently by individuals with varying uncertainty orientations.
    • Personality styles significantly moderate the impact of social group dynamics on persuasive message processing.
    • Findings highlight the interplay between social identity, personality, and cognitive processing of persuasive information.