Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring against clinical standards.

Charles D Shaw1

  • 1CASPE Research, London, UK. cshaw@kehf.org.uk

Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
|July 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How can healthcare standards be standardised?

BMJ quality & safety·2015
Same author

The effect of certification and accreditation on quality management in 4 clinical services in 73 European hospitals.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2014
Same author

Evidence-based organization and patient safety strategies in European hospitals.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2014
Same author

Small, not large, teams assess hospitals internationally.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2013
Same author

Profiling health-care accreditation organizations: an international survey.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2013
Same author

Comparison of health service accreditation programs in low- and middle-income countries with those in higher income countries: a cross-sectional study.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2012
Same journal

Reference intervals for venous blood gas measurement in a healthy Chinese population.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Multiplex methylation marker analysis for ctDNA detection in liquid biopsies from anal cancer patients: an HPV-independent approach.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of patient-based exponentially weighted moving average quality control models for three antipsychotic drugs and their metabolites by LC-MS/MS.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Comparing conventional correction formulas and machine learning-based prediction of ionized calcium.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Micro- and nanoplastics as emerging clinical analytes: analytical validation, interpretive uncertainty, and laboratory actionability in human specimens.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Performance of Free Light Chain reagents in the Dutch External Quality Assessment programme over the past 14 years.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Objective measurement against standards is crucial for health service improvement. Quality systems require diverse approaches to define, measure, and enhance clinical competence, practice, and organizational accreditation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Systematic health service improvement necessitates objective measurement against explicit standards.
  • Effective quality systems integrate diverse definitions and methods for quality assessment and enhancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a framework for assessing health services through objective measurement.
  • To explore different approaches to defining, measuring, and improving quality in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Examining clinical performance from three professional viewpoints: clinical competence, clinical practice, and service accreditation.
  • Utilizing methods such as peer review, clinical audit, and organizational assessment against published standards.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Clinical competence assessment focuses on individual practitioners and continuing development.
  • Clinical practice assessment evaluates processes and outcomes against evidence-based best practices to reduce variation.
  • Service accreditation evaluates healthcare organizations against standards to promote best management practices.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-faceted approach to quality measurement, encompassing individual practitioners, clinical processes, and organizational management, is essential for systematic health service improvement.
  • Clearer responsibilities for ongoing practitioner support are needed.
  • Accreditation systems, managed impartially, are vital for organizational quality assurance.