Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The suspensions scandal.

P J Tomlin1

  • 1The Suspended Doctors Group, Society of Clinical Psychiatrists, UK.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology : the Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
|July 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A memorable incident: when a shovel should be an agricultural implement.

The Western journal of medicine·1999
Same author

A memorable incident: when a spade is not a spade.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1999
Same author

Some effects of anaesthesia and surgery on carbohydrate and fat metabolism. 1969.

British journal of anaesthesia·1998
Same author

The aftermath of the Bristol case. Society of clinical psychiatrists supports doctors who have been suspended.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1998
Same author

UN Declaration of Human Rights. NHS does not heed human rights declaration.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1998
Same author

Professional performance bill. Will result in doctors being suspended from register.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1995
Same journal

Beyond an incidental finding: Reframing persistent left superior vena cava as a marker of comprehensive foetal cardiovascular assessment.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Including support people in gestational diabetes mellitus education: Understanding providers' perspectives.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Sociodemographic factors shaping knowledge-attitude-behaviour pathways in postpartum fall prevention.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

A 3.6:1 myo-inositol to D-chiro-inositol ratio and antioxidant-based food supplement before IVF improves fertility in women with PCOS: a pilot observational retrospective cohort study.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Elevated non-esterified fatty acids in obese women with late-onset preeclampsia: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Retraction Statement: Vaginal length and sexual function after vertical versus horizontal closure of the vaginal cuff after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

The National Health Service

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law and Ethics
  • Healthcare Management
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The disciplinary process for senior hospital doctors in the UK's National Health Service (NHS) is complex and often contentious.
  • Concerns exist regarding fairness, efficiency, and the impact on medical professionals' well-being and rights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the NHS disciplinary process for senior hospital doctors.
  • To identify systemic faults and their impact on due process and human rights.
  • To assess the efficiency and resource implications of the current disciplinary procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the disciplinary procedures and mechanisms used within the NHS for senior doctors.
  • Identification of procedural faults and comparison with principles of 'Natural Justice' and the Human Rights Act.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of risk factors associated with vulnerability within the process.

    • Main Results:

    • The disciplinary process contains numerous faults, unfairly favoring management and contravening 'Natural Justice' principles.
    • An excessive number of doctors are wrongfully suspended for prolonged periods, causing significant harm and even mortality (2%).
    • The process is inefficient, with management frequently unable to prove misconduct, wasting financial resources.

    Conclusions:

    • The current NHS disciplinary process for senior doctors is oppressive, inefficient, and potentially unlawful.
    • Specific demographic factors (race, sex, specialty, e.g., obstetricians) increase vulnerability.
    • Urgent reform is needed to ensure fairness, efficiency, and adherence to human rights standards.