[Bone marrow suppression--including guidelines for the appropriate use of G-CSF]

For previously untreated patients receiving most chemotherapy regimens, primary prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) cannot be recommended. Secondary prophylactic G-CSF administration can lessen incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy in patients with a prior episode of FN. Physicians should consider chemotherapy dose reduction after neutropenic fever or severe or prolonged neutropenia after the previous cycle of treatment. Intervention with G-CSF in afebrile neutropenic patients is not recommended. For the majority of patients with FN, the available data do not clearly support the routine initiation of G-CSF as an adjunct to antibiotic therapy. However, certain FN patients may have prognostic factors that are predictive of clinical deterioration, such as pneumonia, hypotension, multiorgan dysfunction (sepsis syndrome), or fungal infection. The therapeutic use of G-CSF together with antibiotics may be reasonable in such high-risk patients. Empirical antifungal therapy is effective, especially for patients with neutropenia who were treated for seven days with empirical antibiotic therapy but remained febrile, or became afebrile but then had recurrent fever. The patient's overall clinical status and laboratory parameters are both considered when deciding to transfuse a patient. Epoetin may be available for use in the future as a treatment option for patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia with a hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dl. Giving prophylactic platelets at a threshold of 10,000/microliter compared with 20,000/microliter can decrease the total utilization of platelets with only a small adverse effect on bleeding, and no statistically significant effect on morbidity.