Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Endometrial ablation.

Paul McGurgan1, Peter O'Donovan

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Southmead Hospital Hospital, Bristol, UK. paul_mc_gurgan@hotmail.com

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|July 15, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transitioning Prostacyclin Pathway Agents to Oral Selexipag in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Literature Review.

Advances in therapy·2026
Same author

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Systematic Literature Review.

Digestion·2024
Same author

The clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of treatments for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and cost-effectiveness of treatments: A systematic literature review.

Medicine·2024
Same author

The Schweitzer effect: The fundamental relationship between experience and medical students' opinions on professional behaviours.

Medical teacher·2023
Same author

Predictive modelling of response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ breast cancer.

NPJ breast cancer·2023
Same author

Stigmatizing attitudes towards mental illness: A cross-sectional survey of Australian medical students.

Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists·2023
Same journal

Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in group prenatal care research.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Complex benign gynecology in perimenopause: current evidence and future directions.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Role of insulin in female reproduction.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Urinary tract involvement in endometriosis: current evidence and clinical insights into navigating diagnosis and management.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in ultrasound imaging of adenomyosis and clinical impacts.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Endometrial ablation is a validated treatment, but newer techniques require more research for long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Hysterectomy rates have not declined as expected with these endometrial destruction methods.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Endometrial ablation has been established for over two decades.
  • Research, controversy, and speculation continue regarding its efficacy and safety.
  • A PubMed search yielded 175 articles on endometrial ablation between 2000-2003.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current status of endometrial ablation techniques.
  • To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of various methods.
  • To assess the impact of endometrial ablation on hysterectomy rates.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and PubMed search.
  • Analysis of long-term follow-up data for first-generation methods (laser, resection, rollerball).
  • Assessment of second-generation devices based on available randomized trials and follow-up data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • First-generation endometrial ablation methods have up to 20 years of follow-up data.
  • Second-generation devices show favorable comparisons in randomized trials but lack long-term cost-effectiveness data.
  • Limited data exist for comparing endometrial ablation with the Mirena intrauterine device.

Conclusions:

  • Conventional endometrial ablation is well-validated.
  • Newer endometrial ablation techniques lack sufficient patient numbers and follow-up for full evaluation of long-term outcomes.
  • Hysterectomy rates have not decreased as anticipated, suggesting a potential shift in surgical management thresholds.