Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing best practice in critical care nursing: knowledge, evidence and practice.

Paul Fulbrook1

  • 1Institute of Health & Community Studies, Bournemouth University, Royal London House, Bournemouth. fulbrook@bournemouth.ac.uk

Nursing in Critical Care
|July 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Evidence-based critical care nursing faces challenges as qualitative nursing knowledge is undervalued. A pragmatic approach is needed, valuing all evidence types equally within their context for stronger nursing practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of a Pressure Injury Prevention Bundle in an Australian Intensive Care Unit: A Before and After Study.

Nursing in critical care·2025
Same author

Pressure injury risk assessment for palliative care patients in the acute hospital setting: a scoping review.

BMC palliative care·2025
Same author

The Psychometric Properties of the Braden Scale to Assess Pressure Injury Risk in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.

Journal of clinical nursing·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of Organisational Strategies for Pressure Injury Prevention and Treatment in Acute Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.

Journal of advanced nursing·2025
Same author

Incidence and Characteristics of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Acute Palliative Care Patients: A Four-Year Analysis.

Journal of clinical nursing·2025
Same author

Screening and assessment of falls risk in the emergency department.

Australasian emergency care·2025

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Qualitative research

Background:

  • Current evidence-based critical care nursing prioritizes positivist paradigms, devaluing qualitative research and personal knowing.
  • This hierarchy creates a 'Catch 22' where nursing's practical knowledge, often 'soft science,' is deemed weak evidence.
  • Nurses utilize various forms of knowledge, some difficult to articulate, complicating evidence appraisal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the disparity in evidence valuation within critical care nursing.
  • To propose a framework for integrating diverse nursing knowledge forms.
  • To advocate for a pragmatic approach to evidence appraisal in nursing.

Main Methods:

  • The paper argues for a paradigm shift in evidence evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It proposes a pragmatic approach considering context-specific value of all knowledge forms.
  • It suggests practice development as a catalyst for change.
  • Main Results:

    • The current evidence hierarchy disadvantages crucial nursing knowledge.
    • A pragmatic approach can elevate the status of all nursing evidence.
    • Integrating diverse knowledge forms strengthens the evidence base for nursing practice.

    Conclusions:

    • A pragmatic approach is essential to recognize the full spectrum of nursing knowledge.
    • Valuing all evidence types contextually enhances critical care nursing practice.
    • Practice development should be the primary driver for evidence integration in nursing.