Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Motion-reversal visual evoked responses.

M Kuba1, N Toyonaga, Z Kubová

  • 1Medical Faculty of Charles University, Department of Pathophysiology, Hradec Králové, Czechoslovakia.

Physiological Research
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the transfer rate of waterpipe additives to smoke as an integral part of toxicological risk assessments.

Toxicology reports·2022
Same author

Methods of improving the quality of life in patients with stable maculopathy-pilot results of a new study.

Ceska a slovenska oftalmologie : casopis Ceske oftalmologicke spolecnosti a Slovenske oftalmologicke spolecnosti·2019
Same author

Bioinspired locomotion and grasping in water: the soft eight-arm OCTOPUS robot.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2015
Same author

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the history, current view and new perspectives.

Neoplasma·2014
Same author

Gender impact on electrophysiological activity of the brain.

Physiological research·2012
Same author

Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: experience in Japan.

Infection·2012
Same journal

Effects of THC, CBD, and Their Combination on EEG Dynamics in Rats.

Physiological research·2026
Same journal

Prophylactic Effect of Echinacoside on PIPN by Inhibiting Spinal Neuroinflammation and Exerting Neuroprotective Effects.

Physiological research·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Motor Learning Abilities Using Balance Training in Young and Senior Women.

Physiological research·2026
Same journal

The Role of NAT10-Mediated ac4C Modification in Osteoblast Function and Bone Formation: Insights from Integrative Bioinformatics and Experimental Validation.

Physiological research·2026
Same journal

Challenges and Solutions in Low-Biomass Respiratory Microbiome Profiling: A Workflow for Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Sequencing in Guinea Pigs.

Physiological research·2026
Same journal

Sodium Selenite Attenuates Monocrotaline-Induced Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension by Upregulating GPX3 and Ameliorating Vascular Remodeling.

Physiological research·2026
See all related articles

Motion-reversal visual evoked responses (VERs) show variable waveforms due to differing contributions from motion or pattern components. Understanding these components aids in interpreting VERs for visual processing research.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Psychophysics
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Motion-reversal visual evoked responses (VERs) exhibit significant waveform variability.
  • This variability is hypothesized to stem from the differential dominance of motion-related versus pattern-onset/offset related neural components.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the underlying components contributing to the variability in motion-reversal VERs.
  • To correlate specific peaks in the VER waveform with distinct visual stimulus events (motion onset/offset, pattern onset/offset).

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of motion-reversal visual evoked responses (VERs).
  • Identification and latency measurement of key waveform peaks.
  • Correlation of VER components with known visual stimulation events.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The first positive peak (approx. 100 ms latency) aligns with pattern-onset components.
  • A subsequent positive peak (approx. 130 ms latency) corresponds to pattern-offset positivity.
  • A main negative peak (approx. 170 ms latency) resembles motion-onset VER components.

Conclusions:

  • Motion-reversal VER variability is explained by the interplay of motion- and pattern-evoked neural signals.
  • Stimulus characteristics (contrast, velocity, location) and individual sensitivity modulate these components.
  • This understanding refines the interpretation of VERs in visual neuroscience and clinical applications.