Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Malpractice liability for informal consultations.

Robert S Olick1, George R Bergus

  • 1Center for Bioethics and Humanities, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. olickr@upstate.edu

Family Medicine
|July 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Religious Exemptions, Public Health, and School Vaccination Requirements.

JAMA pediatrics·2023
Same author

When Adolescents Disagree with Their Vaccine-Hesitant Parents about COVID-19 Vaccination.

The Journal of clinical ethics·2023
Same author

Ethical Issues in Mandating COVID-19 Vaccination for Health Care Personnel.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2021
Same author

Resident Remediation in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Survey of Program Directors.

Family medicine·2021
Same author

Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID·2021
Same author

Adolescent Consent to COVID-19 Vaccination: The Need for Law Reform.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)·2021
Same journal

A Practical Framework for Teaching Women's Health Procedures.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the Disrupted Pathway: The Representation Gap for Hispanics/Latinos in Academic Family Medicine Leadership.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Comment on "Redefining Value in Family Medicine Obstetrics: A Pathway to Sustainable Rural Maternity Care".

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

The Power of Presence.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Advancing Hybrid Interviewing: From Bias Concerns to Assessment Quality.

Family medicine·2026
Same journal

Seeing Beneath the Surface.

Family medicine·2026
See all related articles

Informal physician consultations between primary care physicians and specialists pose minimal malpractice risk. Courts consistently find no physician-patient relationship, thus no duty of care, in these informal consults.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Physician Communication
  • Risk Management

Background:

  • Informal consultations are common among primary care physicians.
  • Physicians communicate via in-person, phone, or email.
  • Malpractice liability is a concern for specialists engaging in informal consults.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess malpractice liability risk for physicians involved in informal consultations.
  • To review judicial opinions concerning informal physician consults.

Main Methods:

  • Searched medical literature and Westlaw database for relevant judicial opinions.
  • Identified cases addressing the legal relationship and duty of care in informal consultations.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Courts consistently rule no physician-patient relationship is formed in informal consultations.
  • No grounds for malpractice claims were found due to the absence of a formal relationship.
  • Malpractice risks are minimal regardless of communication method.

Conclusions:

  • Informal consultations do not typically establish a legal duty of care.
  • Legal parameters for informal consultations are defined by consistent court criteria.
  • Physicians face minimal malpractice risk from informal consults.