Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Analysts who commit sexual boundary violations: a lost cause?

Andrea Celenza1, Glen O Gabbard

  • 1Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, USA. Acelenza@aol.com

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|July 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Writing as Thinking and Loving.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2024
Same author

Stance, Set, Transference: The Differentiation of Two Modes of Clinical Technique.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2022
Same author

The Decline and Fall of Neutrality in Psychoanalytic Discourse.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2022
Same author

Maternal Erotic Transferences and the Work of the Abject.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2022
Same author

Narcissism and suicide risk.

Annals of general psychiatry·2022
Same author

Psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) in healthcare professionals.

Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy·2021
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study examines sexual misconduct by therapists, countering myths about transgressors with data from over 200 cases. It identifies common therapist traits and warns against denying universal vulnerabilities to prevent misconduct.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Therapeutic Ethics

Background:

  • Sexual misconduct by analysts is a significant ethical concern.
  • Misconceptions about transgressors, such as psychopathy and repeat offenses, are prevalent.
  • Understanding the characteristics of therapists involved in misconduct is crucial for prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the causes of sexual misconduct in psychoanalysis.
  • To assess the potential for rehabilitation among therapists who engage in sexual misconduct.
  • To challenge common assumptions about individuals who commit sexual misconduct.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from over 200 cases of sexual misconduct evaluations and/or treatments.
  • Review of typical characteristics associated with therapists engaging in sexual misconduct.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of psychological defense mechanisms contributing to vulnerability.
  • Main Results:

    • Most cases involved one-time transgressors, challenging the assumption of psychopathy and repeat offenses.
    • Identified common traits in therapists involved in misconduct, noting these exist to some degree in therapists generally.
    • The denial of universal vulnerability mirrors psychological compartmentalization, increasing risk.

    Conclusions:

    • Rehabilitation viability varies depending on the type of transgressor.
    • Therapist characteristics associated with misconduct are not necessarily indicative of psychopathy but rather common vulnerabilities.
    • Acknowledging and addressing universal vulnerabilities is key to preventing sexual misconduct in therapy.