Related Experiment Videos
Special intervention reduces CVD mortality for adherent participants in the multiple risk factor intervention trial
Brooks B Gump1, Karen A Matthews
1State University of New York, Oswego, USA.
Insights
Patient adherence to the Special Intervention (SI) in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Poor adherence, however, increased CVD mortality risk compared to Usual Care (UC).
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology
- Health Behavior Research
Background:
- Patient adherence significantly impacts treatment efficacy.
- Adherence is paradoxically linked to reduced mortality in placebo groups.
- Understanding adherence is crucial for interpreting clinical trial results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of patient adherence in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT).
- To determine the impact of adherence on cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in participants randomized to Special Intervention (SI) or Usual Care (UC).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from 12,338 men in the prospective MRFIT study with a 9-year follow-up.
- Annual visit attendance rates served as the primary measure of participant adherence.
- Statistical analysis examined the interaction between adherence and group assignment on CVD mortality.
Main Results:
- A significant interaction between adherence and group assignment (p =.002) was observed.
- Special Intervention (SI) reduced CVD mortality for highly adherent participants (RR =.91) but increased it for poorly adherent participants (RR = 1.28) versus Usual Care (UC).
- These findings persisted after controlling for baseline characteristics, illness, or nonfatal CVD events.
Conclusions:
- Special Intervention (SI) demonstrated reduced CVD mortality risk solely among adherent participants in the MRFIT.
- Positive changes in CVD risk factors, such as reduced smoking and blood pressure, accounted for the benefits in adherent individuals.
- The study suggests evaluating treatment efficacy by considering patient response subgroups, like adherence to study visits.
Background:
Patient adherence affects treatment efficacy, and surprisingly, adherence is frequently associated with reductions in mortality for those receiving placebo.
Methods:
This study considers the role of trial adherence for men (N = 12,338) in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), a prospective study of 9-year follow-up mortality following randomization to Special Intervention (SI) or Usual Care (UC). Annual visit attendance rates were used as a measure of adherence.
Results:
A significant Adherence x Group Assignment interaction (p =.002) revealed that SI significantly reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality for highly adherent participants, RR =.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] =.84-.99) but significantly increased CVD mortality for poorly adherent participants, RR = 1.28 (95% CI = 1.05-1.57) when compared to UC. These associations remained after controlling for baseline characteristics (e.g., income), reported illness, or occurrence of a nonfatal CVD event during the trial. The beneficial effect of SI among the adherent participants was partly due to reduced smoking and diastolic blood pressure levels during the trial.
Conclusions:
SI significantly reduced the risk of CVD mortality for participants adherent with the MRFIT, and this effect was accounted for by positive changes in CVD risk factors. These findings suggest a method for evaluating treatment efficacy in subgroups determined by patient responses (e.g., adherence to annual assessment visits) to the treatment program after randomization.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care