Schatzki ring, statistically reexamined
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Aortic Ring Assay
Published on: November 24, 2009
John C Pezzullo1, Ann M Lewicki
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Biostatistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. johnp71@aol.com
Abstract:
In the article by Schatzki published in 1963, data about the lower esophageal ring relate ring diameter to presence of dysphagia. Statistical analysis of these measurements was performed to quantify conclusions of Schatzki and to extract additional information from the data. Ring diameters in 332 patients with and without dysphagia are described in a histogram in the original article of Schatzki. Data were evaluated with analysis of variance, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to quantify the relationship between ring diameter and dysphagia. Follow-up information was available in 36 symptomatic and 30 asymptomatic patients of Schatzki. Logistic regression indicated that there was a highly significant difference in ring diameter between the asymptomatic group and patients with recurrent dysphagia (P <.001) but not in patients who had a single episode of dysphagia at presentation (P =.229). Odds ratio of 0.686 indicated that a 1-mm increase in ring diameter decreased the likelihood of dysphagia by 31%; conversely, a 1-mm decrease in ring diameter increased the likelihood of dysphagia by 46%. ROC curve of sensitivity and specificity of ring diameter and symptoms showed that the 20-mm cutoff of Schatzki had a 96% (104 of 108) sensitivity and a 58% (130 of 224) specificity, with area under the ROC curve of 0.888. Retrospective statistical analysis of original data of Schatzki validated his major conclusions about the data. Some important questions remain unanswered because of missing data in the study of Schatzki.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
McNemar's Test

