Related Experiment Videos
Characterization of nonmutagenic Cr(III)-DNA interactions
Sean A Blankert1, Virginia H Coryell, Brian T Picard
1Department of Chemistry, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 5698, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011-5698, USA.
Chemical Research in Toxicology
|July 23, 2003
Summary
Carcinogenic chromium(VI) exposure forms chromium(III)-DNA adducts. This study found chromium(III) chloride produced DNA adducts but they were not mutagenic, questioning chromium(III)
Area of Science:
- Environmental toxicology
- Molecular toxicology
- Genetics
Background:
- Carcinogenic chromium(VI) exposure leads to chromium(III)-DNA adducts, but their role in tumor formation is unknown.
- Chromium(III) complexes are used to model chromium(VI) metabolism products for mechanistic studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize chromium(III) complex interactions with DNA.
- To evaluate chromium(III) complexes as models for chromium(VI)-induced DNA damage.
Main Methods:
- Compared DNA reactivity of chromic chloride hexahydrate (CrCl(3)) and sodium bis(l-cysteinato)chromium(III) dihydrate (Cr(cys)(2)(-)) with cis-platin.
- Assessed DNA unwinding via gel electrophoresis mobility shifts.
- Measured Cr-DNA adducts in CHO AA8 cells and mutagenicity using the hypoxanthine-Guanine phosphoribosyltransferase assay.
Main Results:
- CrCl(3) caused minimal DNA unwinding (1-2 degrees) compared to cis-platin; Cr(cys)(2)(-) showed weak DNA interaction.
- CrCl(3) produced Cr-DNA adducts in cells at levels similar to Cr(VI), while Cr(cys)(2)(-) did not.
- CrCl(3)-induced lesions were not mutagenic in the tested assay.
Conclusions:
- CrCl(3) may form non-distorting Cr(III)-DNA adducts, possibly via backbone association.
- The models CrCl(3) and Cr(cys)(2)(-) may not accurately represent Cr(III) products from Cr(VI) metabolism.
- Further molecular understanding of Cr(III)-DNA interactions is needed to determine their role in Cr(VI)-induced carcinogenesis.