Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Skin-sparing mastectomy.

Rache M Simmons1, Tara L Adamovich

  • 1Department of Surgery, The New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 451 East 61st Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. rms2002@med.cornell.edu

The Surgical Clinics of North America
|July 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cryoablation Without Excision for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ICE3 Trial 5-Year Follow-Up on Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence.

Annals of surgical oncology·2024
Same author

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: <i>AJR</i> Expert Panel Narrative Review.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2023
Same author

Cryoablation Without Excision for Low-Risk Early-Stage Breast Cancer: 3-Year Interim Analysis of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in the ICE3 Trial.

Annals of surgical oncology·2021
Same author

A Phase II Trial Exploring the Success of Cryoablation Therapy in the Treatment of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Results from ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1072.

Annals of surgical oncology·2016
Same author

Advocating Nonsurgical Management of Patients With Small, Incidental Radial Scars at the Time of Needle Core Biopsy: A Study of 77 Cases.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2015
Same author

An unusual breast lesion: granular cell tumor of the breast with extensive chest wall invasion.

Journal of surgical oncology·2014
Same journal

Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Scalpel's Reach.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Society.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Hospitals.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions for Providers.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Patients Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) offers superior cosmetic results for breast reconstruction compared to traditional methods. This oncologically safe procedure preserves breast skin, enhancing natural appearance and reducing the need for further symmetry surgeries.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
  • Breast Cancer Treatment

Background:

  • Breast reconstruction outcomes are significantly influenced by the amount of remaining breast skin post-mastectomy.
  • Preserving maximum breast skin improves aesthetic results and minimizes contralateral breast procedures for symmetry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the oncological safety and cosmetic benefits of skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction.
  • To compare SSM with nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSSM) regarding aesthetic outcomes, local recurrence (LR) rates, and complications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of numerous studies comparing SSM with immediate reconstruction versus traditional NSSM.
  • Assessment of oncological parameters including local recurrence rates, detection of recurrence, and suitability for adjuvant therapies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of cosmetic outcomes and complication rates associated with SSM.

    • Main Results:

    • SSM with immediate reconstruction yields superior aesthetic results compared to NSSM, with comparable local recurrence rates.
    • The ability to detect local recurrence on the chest wall skin is not compromised by SSM.
    • Local wound complication rates for SSM are similar to NSSM, and oncological procedures like sentinel lymph node biopsy are feasible.

    Conclusions:

    • SSM is an oncologically acceptable procedure for selected breast cancer patients undergoing immediate reconstruction.
    • It offers significant cosmetic advantages over traditional NSSM, leading to improved patient satisfaction and reduced need for secondary surgeries.
    • Contraindications include specific conditions like inflammatory carcinoma, but for many, SSM provides superior outcomes.